does anyone know tbe difference between 94-95 longtube headers and 87-93 headers
#1
![Default](https://mustangforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok I have a 91 hatch and 94-95 long tube headers but before I put them on has anyone done this before? I've had tons of mustangs but I've never tryed put sn stuff on a fox will they work?
#2
![Default](https://mustangforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the difference is that the 94-95 long tubes are spread a little further apart than the fox body. You may have to use an O/R h or x pipe for the 94-95. I used a set of fox body long tubes on my 94 and had some clearance issues at the t5 trans where the clutch fork is. I had to flatten one of the primaries to clear the trans. My headers that I used came with an h pipe designed for the foxbody and I had to cut the cross pipe and put a sleeve in to make it wider. There has to be a difference because when you order long tubes the ones for 94-95 say they only fit those years and visa versa for the fox headers.
#4
![Default](https://mustangforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea the ones I bought were for a fox body but I made them work on my 94, of course the fitment issue may have been the fact that they were cheap obx header. I don't have much experience with the big market headers like mac or bbk
#6
![Default](https://mustangforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just about all long tubes cause interference with the steering shaft. Not all but most its usually only just rubbing a little, most pple are able to ding the primary and get away with it some pple have been known to shim the engine up using washers. I had to ding my primary where it contacted the steering. the correct fix is to get an after market steering shaft with out a rag joint in it. I think the company is called flaming river that most use
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
09-20-2015 10:49 PM
Boostaddict
Lethal Performance
2
09-08-2015 09:56 PM