performance alignment specs...
#3
RE: performance alignment specs...
The only alignment specs that you can control are toe in and camber. Toe in is more a matter of taste than performance. Ford specifies toe out for the mustang, which surprised me. This is the only rear drive car I know where the manufacturer specifies toe out, but I am no alignment expert. Anyway, the more toe out you dial in, the sharper your turn in response will be, at some point the car gets too "darty", I won't use the term "unstable". You can set your toe in for "zero" which is what I would use. If you adjust your car for toe in, maybe 1/16 inch, your car car will track straighter on highly crowned roads. If you live in Iowa or Pennsylvaniathatcan bea serious consideration.
You can set your front camber to be more negative, this will help prevent understeer in hard cornering, but the effect is very small. You have to use camber adjustment bolts or plates. For a street car I highly recommend 0.5 degrees negative camber, this allows the tires to "bite" immediately on turn in, and is about the maximum you can get and still expect even tire wear. If you use more negative camber you must be seriously looking to shave another .10 second off your lap times.
If you have camber bolts you may be able to adjust your caster. You probably cannot adjust it very much, and it makes no difference what the number is unless you are trying to shave the last .01 second off your lap times. Just adjust both sides of the car to the same caster value. Theoretically more caster makes your car more stable and provides better camber path in corners, but for practical purposes you will never notice.
You can set your front camber to be more negative, this will help prevent understeer in hard cornering, but the effect is very small. You have to use camber adjustment bolts or plates. For a street car I highly recommend 0.5 degrees negative camber, this allows the tires to "bite" immediately on turn in, and is about the maximum you can get and still expect even tire wear. If you use more negative camber you must be seriously looking to shave another .10 second off your lap times.
If you have camber bolts you may be able to adjust your caster. You probably cannot adjust it very much, and it makes no difference what the number is unless you are trying to shave the last .01 second off your lap times. Just adjust both sides of the car to the same caster value. Theoretically more caster makes your car more stable and provides better camber path in corners, but for practical purposes you will never notice.
#5
RE: performance alignment specs...
ORIGINAL: RodeoFlyer
Steeda recommends as much as 1.3 degrees neg camber for the street. i'm right at 1 degree on the street right now with no adverse tire wear.
Steeda recommends as much as 1.3 degrees neg camber for the street. i'm right at 1 degree on the street right now with no adverse tire wear.
Thanks.
#6
RE: performance alignment specs...
getting alignment next week and thinking the samething, bmr springs with d-spec's, front lowered 1 1/2 inch. Went to dealership with camber bolts from stangsuspenion and they said not for amustang. They gave me a printout with the front camber at -1.74, I installed the camber bolts myself and set it full positive, going elsewhere for alignment. Thinking about -.75 to -1 camber setting
#8
RE: performance alignment specs...
ORIGINAL: leepinlen
getting alignment next week and thinking the samething, bmr springs with d-spec's, front lowered 1 1/2 inch. Went to dealership with camber bolts from stangsuspenion and they said not for amustang. They gave me a printout with the front camber at -1.74, I installed the camber bolts myself and set it full positive, going elsewhere for alignment. Thinking about -.75 to -1 camber setting
getting alignment next week and thinking the samething, bmr springs with d-spec's, front lowered 1 1/2 inch. Went to dealership with camber bolts from stangsuspenion and they said not for amustang. They gave me a printout with the front camber at -1.74, I installed the camber bolts myself and set it full positive, going elsewhere for alignment. Thinking about -.75 to -1 camber setting
BTW...say what you like about the Sportlines, but I'm having no issues with them, and love the ride height. They have settled a little, and the factory shocks are starting to get a little "soft" (still waiting for coilovers) but for basically a stock suspension, this thing rocks!!
#9
RE: performance alignment specs...
ORIGINAL: RodeoFlyer
I have H&R race springs, Bilsteins, and a RossMustang k-member with my roll center corrected. I also have K-Mac camber/caster plates.
I have H&R race springs, Bilsteins, and a RossMustang k-member with my roll center corrected. I also have K-Mac camber/caster plates.
Thanks.