Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Strut tower braces...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2011, 11:22 AM
  #11  
Whiskey11
2nd Gear Member
 
Whiskey11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
Ford did not put it on for looks. It does something that is measurable or Ford would not spend the time and money on it.

It costs Ford a HUGE amount of money just to carry the part number in their system. They would only do it for a result, especially since it is underhood and not really going to sell anyone on buying a Mustang because it has a STB.
Yes, like the functioning hood scoop, side scoops and louver scoops, or the functioning spoiler or, or, or, or.

Ford doesn't always do something because it has some performance benefit.

As with various other threads about this, I have a feeling that it does something for the NVH, cowl shake maybe lessened or something but I doubt it does anything for performance without tying into the firewall.

The physics behind it also doesn't help it's claim to doing anything for performance. The forces of the spring and shock are concentrated at the 4 bolts at the top of the strut. The angle those forces during compression is going to be transmitted in line with the strut which means up and back and slightly inward. The majority of the force is going to be in the up direction with a minor fraction of it being in the inward direction or the rearward direction. If you look at the strut towers they are built like a tank. I doubt that the tiny fraction of a force inward is going to move the strut towers on an S197. Even if it does I cannot see it being noticeable to the driver as it is going to be so tiny.

Here is a 6 page thread done by people with far more time to devote to the tiny things in car suspension than I have. If anyone is going to know if it does anything, it'll be these guys, and one actually did a test:

http://www.corner-carvers.com/forums...ut+tower+brace

You may have to follow some links in the thread to find the test, but it's there somewhere.
Whiskey11 is offline  
Old 11-03-2011, 05:44 PM
  #12  
stags
3rd Gear Member
 
stags's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: California, Colorado
Posts: 695
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
Ford did not put it on for looks. It does something that is measurable or Ford would not spend the time and money on it.

It costs Ford a HUGE amount of money just to carry the part number in their system. They would only do it for a result, especially since it is underhood and not really going to sell anyone on buying a Mustang because it has a STB.
By that logic, why would anyone make Throttle Body Spacers? And yet highly reputable companies like Steeda do...
stags is offline  
Old 11-03-2011, 07:03 PM
  #13  
908ssp
3rd Gear Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 645
Default

There is no crime in removing a fool from his money.
908ssp is offline  
Old 11-03-2011, 08:09 PM
  #14  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

Strut towers are angled in, the struts angle in too. There are loads that are in the towers that STB's, even non triangulated ones can help with. If you don't think there is flex there, try an experiment: Lift one front corner of the car and take the brace off you'll see tension there.

Now I'm not going to sit here and say what many do, that's it'll make the car stop understeering, or some such crap because it's not true. But they do help chassis rigidity, and that's never a bad thing. You might find you feel it, maybe not. Older cars will see more benefit than brand new cars. Cars with stiffer suspensions or stickier tires will see more benefit than those with softer springs and crappy tires as there just won't be the same kind of loads imparted to the chassis.

Would this be on the top of my "to do" list. No. Does it matter on this car more than others? Yes, as struts do put a lot of load into the towers, for example double a-arm cars don't do it nearly as much.

Last edited by Sam Strano; 11-03-2011 at 08:12 PM.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 11-05-2011, 09:35 AM
  #15  
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
157dB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 13,322
Default

Originally Posted by FastDEW
Ford did not put it on for looks. It does something that is measurable or Ford would not spend the time and money on it.

It costs Ford a HUGE amount of money just to carry the part number in their system. They would only do it for a result, especially since it is underhood and not really going to sell anyone on buying a Mustang because it has a STB.
They are in the busisness to make money and if a
non-functional or marginally functional STB brace
help sales, so be it.
They did the math and the $$ required to carry the part
was justified in the hopefully increase sales from unsavy
customers.



If Sam says they help, then they help.
Just finding one thats not flimsy and uses
all 8 bolts to attach it can be hard...
Oh yea, the Shelby STB.
Thats the ticket...

157dB is offline  
Old 11-05-2011, 03:01 PM
  #16  
STANGmole
2nd Gear Member
 
STANGmole's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: OR
Posts: 312
Default

I like how people get beat up on the forums for wanting to install a 'useless' strut tower brace, yet $300 rear wings are a must-have option

In the past when I've installed strut tower braces on Mustangs that didn't have them (my current one came with one from Ford) I could tell the difference the minute I pulled out of my driveway at an angle or drove over uneven pavement. The front of the car felt much more solid. Did it help the handling? Probably not...but I wouldn't own a car without one because I like the feel of a chassis that doesn't flex.

Also, I've yet to own one that attached with eight bolts and they still managed to help somehow.
STANGmole is offline  
Old 11-06-2011, 08:20 AM
  #17  
mmarsh3014
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mmarsh3014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 110
Default

Thanks everyone for the input. Future upgrades include other suspension upgrades that would, by design, apply these extra forces that everyone keeps mentioning. But because real life gets in the way of mustang mods, my budget only allows to make one mod at a time until I finally put together a successful combination of parts to have a truly bad-*** street mustang. I have read lots of Strano's recommendations to other customers, and I'll be calling him when the time comes.
mmarsh3014 is offline  
Old 11-06-2011, 08:31 AM
  #18  
Bruno's 06
 
Bruno's 06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 31
Default

I don’t know if they help but in my opinion I think they look great. I plan on getting them just for that reason.
Bruno's 06 is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:07 AM
  #19  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

Originally Posted by STANGmole
I like how people get beat up on the forums for wanting to install a 'useless' strut tower brace, yet $300 rear wings are a must-have option

In the past when I've installed strut tower braces on Mustangs that didn't have them (my current one came with one from Ford) I could tell the difference the minute I pulled out of my driveway at an angle or drove over uneven pavement. The front of the car felt much more solid. Did it help the handling? Probably not...but I wouldn't own a car without one because I like the feel of a chassis that doesn't flex.

Also, I've yet to own one that attached with eight bolts and they still managed to help somehow.
Yeah, you don't need the 8 bolts for them to work. The brace on a Shelby GT was only 4 (2 on each side) same with the brace on my 2011 GT. The brace is a brace, not a structural member of the car. It's job is to help keep the towers from flexing as much.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:04 AM
  #20  
flash_xx
3rd Gear Member
 
flash_xx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Posts: 920
Default

My only concern with the strut tower braces is whether you can apply enough torque to the bolts to make a difference without snapping them. If the brace mounts were welded in and the bars themselves made removable with some heavy duty bolts I'd be more inclined to believe they make a difference.
flash_xx is offline  


Quick Reply: Strut tower braces...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.