Timeslip for the non believers
I finally got my scanner working again, and went ahead and scanned in my timeslip, since I've been seeing a lot of doubt from quite a few people in reference to my previous post about my running a 13.9 in my stock 04 gt. If anyone still has doubts, I invite you to come to northern VA and you can look the car over top to bottom. The only thing thats different is the bumper i had to replace after my encounter with a rather large deer.
[IMG]local://upfiles/3744/Sq470216352.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/3744/Sq470216352.jpg[/IMG]
What was in the other lane? Those are the times I see from GT's down here. Wierd. Anyway I dont doubt ya, but it is a funny coincedence that the other slips posted had 15 sec times for the other lanes too. You know I could crack a joke about it, but I wont. Good times, get that 60 ft down a bit and you have a fun ride there.
What????A .333 is not a foul. The NHRA is running the light on a .000 now. Not a .500. How long has it been since you have been to a track? And even if it was a foul, how would that make is ET any different?
It's from point A to point B. I don't care if you sit there for a minute and a half. Your time between those 2 points is still your elapsed time.
Here is a question for you..what triggers the clock to start running?
And this is what a foul looks like nowadays. Car 373 on the left. Car 626 had a perfect light. .. .000
It's from point A to point B. I don't care if you sit there for a minute and a half. Your time between those 2 points is still your elapsed time.
Here is a question for you..what triggers the clock to start running?
And this is what a foul looks like nowadays. Car 373 on the left. Car 626 had a perfect light. .. .000
the track i was at changed the perfect light from .500 to .000. so my .333 would be the equivilant to a .833 on other tracks that havent changed over. so yes, it sucked some *****, but i didnt trip the red light



