why do ricers lie????
6th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,867
From: VA
RE: why do ricers lie????
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
So I'm stupid cause I love my car?
well... hmm...
ORIGINAL: 40thgtfl
for some reason these rice guys take winning and loosing realy personaly. the import pride (stupidity) will not let them complment a faster car unless its the almighty supra or skyline.... morons. every time i beat a turbo import they tell everyone they see i had NAAAWS. LOL.
for some reason these rice guys take winning and loosing realy personaly. the import pride (stupidity) will not let them complment a faster car unless its the almighty supra or skyline.... morons. every time i beat a turbo import they tell everyone they see i had NAAAWS. LOL.
well... hmm...
5th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,758
From:
RE: why do ricers lie????
ORIGINAL: robb4964
This site is pretty cool. I almost bought me a fox body for 2200$ but the wife wont let me have any more sports cars unless I sell one mine. Figured If I cant have another pony Id at least keep up with the latest news. If the 07 Camaro fails to come out in a timely manor I may break down and purchase a 05 GT in a few years.
ORIGINAL: codyss
robb4964, Whats up.
I was on CZ28.com for a while but I recently sold my last F-Body so all I have is my Cobalt SS/SC now. I followed Redstanger to this forum.
robb4964, Whats up.
I was on CZ28.com for a while but I recently sold my last F-Body so all I have is my Cobalt SS/SC now. I followed Redstanger to this forum.
ORIGINAL: so1o2k3
hahaha "ricer behavior"...you guys made it sound like a discovery channel documentation. that was priceless
hahaha "ricer behavior"...you guys made it sound like a discovery channel documentation. that was priceless
4th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,817
From:
RE: why do ricers lie????
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
I could'nt agree more and they were lighter than the normal 300z. The 300Z twin turbo if I remember correctly was a two seater and was quite a bit shorter.
ORIGINAL: robb4964
300Z's ran high 13's back in the 90's. 13.8-14.3 in most articles. Thats almost identical to LT1 vettes times. One of my friends had one of those as well. I found it for him form a seller in Ohio and at the time they where going for 17k,we paid 7200. he ran a 14.4 stock. He put a Turbo timer,boost guage and cranked it up to 20Pd's and ran a 12.8. For their time they where one helluva nice car and they handled unrealistically good. Still look pretty good too. He sold it for a Crap load more then what I found it for.
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
The twin turbo 300'z were the shizzle in the early 90's. In 1989-1990 I remember how much talk their maketing dept. made with their ads by saying it would out perform the base vette (not ZR1). And I hate to say they did back up their sh*t. Now I'd put a can of whupass on anything Nissan puts out including their new skyline (2009) . They are saying 400bhp but the body weighs about 2 tons.
The twin turbo 300'z were the shizzle in the early 90's. In 1989-1990 I remember how much talk their maketing dept. made with their ads by saying it would out perform the base vette (not ZR1). And I hate to say they did back up their sh*t. Now I'd put a can of whupass on anything Nissan puts out including their new skyline (2009) . They are saying 400bhp but the body weighs about 2 tons.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
