I thought a 5.0 foxbody style vert would beat a 97 Mustang GT stock vs. Stock. I recently raced one in a stock 97 Gt and smoked the 5.0. The car i raced isnt the one in my sig.

 

Cool, wrong forum.

 

if it was a GT vert those are the heaviest of the fox bodies. if it was auto it was a bit slower as well. or your a better driver, but nice kill

 

I thought stock fox' were unbeatable[8D]

 

This 5.0 was an lx vert, not a gt vert just to add in.

 

Look at the hp numbers stock for stock as well

 

hey bypopulardemand, lets run my 5.0 vs your v6? i heard those were quick cars, lets find out!

 

An 87-88 speed density would give you a run, but talking stock, the MAF cars can't touch you.

 

My father owns an '88 GT convertible with an automatic. He's had it since new, and it only has 16,000 miles on it, plus a pair of flowmasters. We recently took it to the track out of curiosity about what it would run and managed a best of only about 15.24 @ 91 mph. The biggest problem was that he couldn't hold the car in second beyond 4800 rpm, which killed the mph...

Anyway, they're fast cars but they are quite beatable, especially with an auto (and what convertible doesn't have an auto?).

 

Well, my '88 LX vert is a 5 speed. Not sure how relevant it is in these yesterday/today bench racing sessions, but the only car of the day that could hold its own against me stock for stock was the vette. I would cream them off the line, but they usually would beat me at the top end.