04 V6 6 speed Accord vs 03 GT 5 speed
There actually is an article marking this....everyone knows it's just a tweaked car Ford sent out, to MM&FF no other, for testing, well not everyone, just those of us who have actually driven the newer stangs and seen them run numerous times. Some people still believe the article, then they run 14.2 and think something is wrong with their car.
A ricer for a ricer. I have yet to let a ricer hang with me. All these guys around here are more for looks than performance for the most part. The only real scare I had awas an infinity G35 and we stood side by side till aabout 145 mph then traffic started coming into sight so we both stopped. But those are European if im not mistaken, but if I am im postiive I will be corrected.
Two things could have made the Accord win. Either it was a bad first time manual driving GT, or he wasn't trying. On a dragstrip if you run a 14.2 it would be a driver's race. Hell I might even believe you if you said you beat him by .5 of a car, but 7-8 come on now, that is about 2-3 seconds in the 1/4, which means it had to be a 94-98 V6 Auto conv.
ORIGINAL: iwrxit
"ballsy" claims my man. oh well, factory freak or not, some cars are fast. i saw a cobra R run 15.5 all day.
test my *****.
"ballsy" claims my man. oh well, factory freak or not, some cars are fast. i saw a cobra R run 15.5 all day.
test my *****.
****edit**** and who crowned you as the 2nd fastest anything in the country? Thats a BIG claim. Just curious.
ORIGINAL: stoner
Okay, well the retard moderator deleted my post because the way I type things makes it sound like I'm flaming other people. Regardless, I'm not, I love cars, I respect cars, but when I beat them or they beat me, I put it how it was.
Okay, well the retard moderator deleted my post because the way I type things makes it sound like I'm flaming other people. Regardless, I'm not, I love cars, I respect cars, but when I beat them or they beat me, I put it how it was.
http://www.v6performance.net/forums/...207&forumid=98
I locked the thread and removed the link from there to here because you were trying to start a cross forum p1ssing contest which is stupid, results in lots of trolling and hostility, and then creates a lot of extra work for us "retard" moderators.
I like this post of yours....
http://www.v6performance.net/forums/...709#post392709
ORIGINAL: stoner
Woohoo!!! They are calling BS on me!
I know some others here with the 7th gen AV6 6MT have beat GT's, I just can't remember who. Speak up if you have, or post there, and back me up
I'm going to work on getting video's up so I can just **** them off with facts.
Woohoo!!! They are calling BS on me!
I know some others here with the 7th gen AV6 6MT have beat GT's, I just can't remember who. Speak up if you have, or post there, and back me up

I'm going to work on getting video's up so I can just **** them off with facts.
The FACT is that if you're pulling 10 cars on 99+ GT's then they're either not trying or not really racing you, are not really 99+ GT's (rebadged V6?), or they're just plain horrible drivers plain and simple. 10 cars in less than a 1/4 mile is well over a full second difference. So if you were to use a little ricer logic, you could probably figure that your basically stock Accord is now able to run 12's. At some point a little reality checking should have kicked in and made you consider the remote possibility of the above reasons I mentioned, but instead here you are making a fool out of yourself on a Mustang site.
lol, good job!
Peace out.
- the "retard" moderator of V6Performance.net
damn, stoner just got his life owned.
And the best part is he STILL thinks he can beat a stock GT. High quality.
Hold On Not Done Accelerating (look at the first letter of every word)
And the best part is he STILL thinks he can beat a stock GT. High quality.
Hold On Not Done Accelerating (look at the first letter of every word)
Raced an 01 GT Premium Auto last wednesday, here's how he ran:
R/T: .866
60': 2.412
330: 6.496
1/8: 9.709@77.33
1000: 12.451
1/4: 14.778@96.46
This was also at 8:00 at night when traction was becomming a problem.
But there are some numbers for ya.
R/T: .866
60': 2.412
330: 6.496
1/8: 9.709@77.33
1000: 12.451
1/4: 14.778@96.46
This was also at 8:00 at night when traction was becomming a problem.
But there are some numbers for ya.


