M3 vs. gt
ORIGINAL: Mac93
Awesome runs man. I think the M3 must not be the 333hp one because those things are fast. I forgot to ask, are you an auto? Very cool, I took down an SRT last night myself.
Awesome runs man. I think the M3 must not be the 333hp one because those things are fast. I forgot to ask, are you an auto? Very cool, I took down an SRT last night myself.
if it was a 2001-2005 M3, that thing would of blew the doors off your stang
ORIGINAL: Mac93
Those are still pretty quick, probably a good match for a stock GT.
ORIGINAL: ski
Nice kills!
The 96-99 BMW M3's had 240 hp, and did 0-60 in mid-upper 5's and the 1/4 in low-mid 14's.
Nice kills!
The 96-99 BMW M3's had 240 hp, and did 0-60 in mid-upper 5's and the 1/4 in low-mid 14's.
I was just supplying some data for 40thgtfl's comment "no i dont think they had 333hp in the 90s".
ORIGINAL: Shaybuttainbk
+1
if it was a 2001-2005 M3, that thing would of blew the doors off your stang
ORIGINAL: Mac93
Awesome runs man. I think the M3 must not be the 333hp one because those things are fast. I forgot to ask, are you an auto? Very cool, I took down an SRT last night myself.
Awesome runs man. I think the M3 must not be the 333hp one because those things are fast. I forgot to ask, are you an auto? Very cool, I took down an SRT last night myself.
if it was a 2001-2005 M3, that thing would of blew the doors off your stang
i have ran them and they arent any faster than my car, might be bad drivers since they are all boca snobs but i have never been pulled by one.
Did you confirm the year with the driver when you raced them? It runs a 13.1 @ 107 http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-m3-page4.html
*edit* I guess it's a little slower used- 13.4 @ 105
*edit* I guess it's a little slower used- 13.4 @ 105
I dont think you answered, are you auto or 5spd? I'm guessing 5spd and a pretty good driver if you took a new GT by what you did with the few mods you have that are un-tuned. Nice kills.


