92 Vert VS. G35
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 263
92 Vert VS. G35
So I was cruising back from the mall yesterday, going under the speed limit, basically hoping to find a race. I was in the 92 LX vert, auto. All that's done is 3.73, k&n, and flows. So anyway we pull up to the light next to this white g35 with nice rims, he said it was stock otherwise. I asked if it was quick, and he said you might be surprised. I said lets go, and when the light turned, we went. I was ahead until I went to third, then he pulled by pretty quickly. I was impressed by my car though. BTW he was auto I think.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 122
From:
RE: 92 Vert VS. G35
ORIGINAL: Wynn
So I was cruising back from the mall yesterday, going under the speed limit, basically hoping to find a race. I was in the 92 LX vert, auto. All that's done is 3.73, k&n, and flows. So anyway we pull up to the light next to this white g35 with nice rims, he said it was stock otherwise. I asked if it was quick, and he said you might be surprised. I said lets go, and when the light turned, we went. I was ahead until I went to third, then he pulled by pretty quickly. I was impressed by my car though. BTW he was auto I think.
So I was cruising back from the mall yesterday, going under the speed limit, basically hoping to find a race. I was in the 92 LX vert, auto. All that's done is 3.73, k&n, and flows. So anyway we pull up to the light next to this white g35 with nice rims, he said it was stock otherwise. I asked if it was quick, and he said you might be surprised. I said lets go, and when the light turned, we went. I was ahead until I went to third, then he pulled by pretty quickly. I was impressed by my car though. BTW he was auto I think.
Have you been to the track to see what you run??
5th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,250
From: NoDak
RE: 92 Vert VS. G35
ORIGINAL: Nickmc123
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 123
From: Milwaukee Area
RE: 92 Vert VS. G35
ORIGINAL: scg87
If by new, you meant '06 back, then yeah, they're not much slower. The new '07 350Z would wax a G coupe. They've run13.30's stock.But new G37 Coupe coming out later this year should be able to beat the '06 back Z's, though. They're gonna have 330hp, and from what some say, that number is under-rated. Damn I want one.....[8D]
ORIGINAL: Nickmc123
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,250
From: NoDak
RE: 92 Vert VS. G35
ORIGINAL: ///M3jack
I also was reading how the G37 will pack on some pounds also.
ORIGINAL: scg87
If by new, you meant '06 back, then yeah, they're not much slower. The new '07 350Z would wax a G coupe. They've run13.30's stock.But new G37 Coupe coming out later this year should be able to beat the '06 back Z's, though. They're gonna have 330hp, and from what some say, that number is under-rated. Damn I want one.....[8D]
ORIGINAL: Nickmc123
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
Sounds like an awesome run. The g35s run in the low 14's usually stock. They are just a tad slower than the new 350z. So they are pretty quick as well.
I really can't wait until they put that engine in the Z.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post