challenger times
Thread Starter
Mach I Section Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,140
From: round abouts these parts
Edmunds - 13.2 @ 107
MT - 13.1 @ 108
C&D - 13.3 @ 108
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...rt8_first_test
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
these times are a lot better than i expected, its a strong running car for sure.
MT - 13.1 @ 108
C&D - 13.3 @ 108
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...rt8_first_test
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
these times are a lot better than i expected, its a strong running car for sure.
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
But if they were saying the SRT-8 starts around 40K, and a plain GT is around 30K, wouldnt the 'sticker' of 45K for a GT500 be closer competition?
Not that it matters, but I was just curious.
I'd assume next years R/T would be a better match for the GT.
ahh..n/m,, i asked Shelby GT, yea, that is around 40K (or 10K for 20 hp and some looks) my bad
Not that it matters, but I was just curious.
I'd assume next years R/T would be a better match for the GT.
ahh..n/m,, i asked Shelby GT, yea, that is around 40K (or 10K for 20 hp and some looks) my bad
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Where do you continue to get 500 hp from?
It's the same 6.1 SRT motor in the Charger and 300C.
13.1 is pretty respectable for such a large car.
It's the same 6.1 SRT motor in the Charger and 300C.
13.1 is pretty respectable for such a large car.


