Stock SS/TC 1/4 time.
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Yeah, under rated like the old SS/SC (2.4 SS wasn't) it was rated 205bhp/200ft-lbs but put down on average 215whp/200ft-lbs. The 08 SS is rated 260/260 and his dynoed 240whp/ 253ftlbs and weight in the 29XXlbs range.Those things are seeing crazy gains from just a tune.
Why is your trap so low?I was browsing around earlier and a guy with a SS/SC with Stage 2 and a couple other things ran a 13.7 but his trap was 105.(Not saying that was relavient to your car and maybe his ET was just high)
Why is your trap so low?I was browsing around earlier and a guy with a SS/SC with Stage 2 and a couple other things ran a 13.7 but his trap was 105.(Not saying that was relavient to your car and maybe his ET was just high)
And with that 1.85 60' I was making the absolute most of the power I had. My car's just not a powerful car.
I've seen equally modded New Edges trapping 2-3 mph higher, but generally no more than a tenth faster.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,302
From: North Carolina
5th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,681
From: delray beach, florida
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,374
From: VA
Here is the vid. It's hard to see the board but listen to the audio.Haha ignore the 10 sec vette...I will add it to first post aswell..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30UxICiLlss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30UxICiLlss
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
I know my car wouldnt come close to a lot of cars in a roll race, but the lower and lower my ET gets, the fewer and fewer cars I could beat from a roll that are running similar ETs.
That video is an example.
I liked it better when I was running 14.5's at 100 lol
That video is an example.
I liked it better when I was running 14.5's at 100 lol
Last edited by 72MachOne99GT; Oct 12, 2008 at 11:32 PM.