Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

LT1 SS Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 05:35 AM
  #11  
Big50's Avatar
Big50
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 479
From: CA
Default

Nice kill. I to believe stock for stock the Lt1 would take a 2v. I had a 95 with an intake and the only mustang i lost to was a cobra.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 05:50 AM
  #12  
Baddog's Avatar
Baddog
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,606
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Soldier GT
Good run man. I had a 93 Z28 IMO it was a tad bit faster than my stang when both were in stock trim. BTW what year did the LS1 come out in the SS?
You're dead on Soldier. 15 more hp, 25 more ftlbs and a 6spd made them quicker than the 2V in every scenario I have been witness to personally. C&D got 0-60 times of 5.3 and the 1/4 in 13.8 in 1993. That is enough to dispatch a New Edge in stock trim in almost every case. My buddy bought his brand new and had no problems hangin' paint on paint with '96-'98 Cobras and beat lesser drivers occasionally...

Last edited by Baddog; Apr 26, 2009 at 05:55 AM.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #13  
OneGearhead's Avatar
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,867
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Nope. '96 was the first year of the 4th gen SS.
oh, ok. thanks. i thought somebody once told me they didnt have an SS in '96, just '97. oh well. ill take your word for it. you would know ;-) haha

i like the '96/'97 look more than the LS1 SS's. granted, huge power difference, but i just like the older body style more. mainly because of the recessed headlights. maybe its due to me loving 4-eye 'Stangs...who knows.....any LS1's put in an LT1 body style? haha
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #14  
tspence45's Avatar
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,879
From: Monmouth, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Grn N Gry 5OH
oh, ok. thanks. i thought somebody once told me they didnt have an SS in '96, just '97. oh well. ill take your word for it. you would know ;-) haha

i like the '96/'97 look more than the LS1 SS's. granted, huge power difference, but i just like the older body style more. mainly because of the recessed headlights. maybe its due to me loving 4-eye 'Stangs...who knows.....any LS1's put in an LT1 body style? haha
Not from the factory. But, there's quite a few people that have done the swap. If my motor ever goes, I'd sure consider it. One for power, and two, so I don't have to worry about the optispark anymore. Even though I can get a kit to run my car off an LS1 pcm and coilpacks.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #15  
OneGearhead's Avatar
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,867
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Not from the factory. But, there's quite a few people that have done the swap. If my motor ever goes, I'd sure consider it. One for power, and two, so I don't have to worry about the optispark anymore. Even though I can get a kit to run my car off an LS1 pcm and coilpacks.
well i knew it wasnt from factory. im not THAT stupid when it comes to GM products. haha i just dont have ALL the info. thats why i come here and ask since theres a lot of GM knowledgeable people in S/S. i wasnt sure if anybody had PUT an LS into that body style though. i figured somebody had. i mean, they put LS1 in Z cars, so why not a car that it could actually look normal in.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
1BAD3V's Avatar
1BAD3V
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Not so much. The LT1 SS's are known to go mid 13's pretty easily, and a few have dipped into the lower 13's bone stock. Unlike LS1's, the LT1 SS's actually did have a performance advantage over the Z28's. They had a true ram air system, and freer flowing exhaust. Also, I'm still a firm believer that 9 times out of 10, an LT1 is going to take a 2v stock for stock. Every time I go to the track, it proves my theory more and more.
I couldnt agree more with you!!
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #17  
Projectquick's Avatar
Projectquick
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,445
From: Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Not so much. The LT1 SS's are known to go mid 13's pretty easily, and a few have dipped into the lower 13's bone stock. Unlike LS1's, the LT1 SS's actually did have a performance advantage over the Z28's. They had a true ram air system, and freer flowing exhaust. Also, I'm still a firm believer that 9 times out of 10, an LT1 is going to take a 2v stock for stock. Every time I go to the track, it proves my theory more and more.
You can't really go by what you've seen at the track especially since I've lost to a total of 2 new edges at the track and my car is just about as fast as a stock new edge should be. I'll agree with the fact that LT1 SS cars were faster than the z28s but saying they had some huge advantage over a new edge is a little iffy to me. I still say the race between any stock LT1 and a stock 4.6 2v is up to the driver, especially on the street.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #18  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default

Originally Posted by Projectquick
You can't really go by what you've seen at the track especially since I've lost to a total of 2 new edges at the track and my car is just about as fast as a stock new edge should be. I'll agree with the fact that LT1 SS cars were faster than the z28s but saying they had some huge advantage over a new edge is a little iffy to me. I still say the race between any stock LT1 and a stock 4.6 2v is up to the driver, especially on the street.
Anything can happen on the street. On paper, the LT1 should win hands down. But we don't race paper....
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #19  
Projectquick's Avatar
Projectquick
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,445
From: Jersey
Default

Exactly.
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #20  
tspence45's Avatar
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,879
From: Monmouth, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Projectquick
You can't really go by what you've seen at the track especially since I've lost to a total of 2 new edges at the track and my car is just about as fast as a stock new edge should be. I'll agree with the fact that LT1 SS cars were faster than the z28s but saying they had some huge advantage over a new edge is a little iffy to me. I still say the race between any stock LT1 and a stock 4.6 2v is up to the driver, especially on the street.
I never said that they had a huge advantage. But, 9 times out of 10, a stock LT1 will take a stock 2v. A race between an LT1 and a 2v, is the LT1 driver's race to lose, which isn't hard to do in an LT1. They're a b*tch to launch. 1st gear is way too long in a 6speed, and low end torque makes an auto difficult to launch also. But, with equal drivers, the LT1 is going to win. Look at it this way. S8ER01Z used to have a '97 Z28 auto. Bone stock, he ran a 14.1 with a 2.1 60', at Cordova Raceway. That's exactly where I race. And exactly where my buddy ran an identical time in his '04 GT. But, my buddy's '04 GT is a 5speed with cai, tb spacer, O/R Prochamber, and Flowmaster catback. We also went with a kid that had an '03 GT auto, with just drop in mufflers. Best time of the day for that car was a 14.9 with a 2.1-2.2 60', and most of its runs were in the low 15's. BTW, that was in -2XX DA. So, they sure weren't running slower due to the DA that day.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.