Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

New Camaros are slow...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2009, 09:32 PM
  #1  
00_buck
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
00_buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 187
Cool New Camaros are slow...

I respected the new camaros much more when I heard about the power they boasted but I raced one today at the stop light to about 85-90 mph and pulled away from it in 1st gear. Granted I have drag radials and a performance transmission, I still expected the SS with 426 (or even 400 if it was an automatic) horsepower to be more of a challenge. I don't know how far away I was because there's no way to tell off the track and I don't know my 1/4 mile time since i upped my boost (and went with the focus fuel pump) but my old time at 7 lbs. was 13.25 and now it's at 10 lbs. and a measly 330 rwhp. I think the LS1 camaros are better than the new ones. But I'll say I've lost some respect for the camaro... Don't feed into all the hype that surrounds the camaro.

Last edited by 00_buck; 10-04-2009 at 09:37 PM.
00_buck is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 09:36 PM
  #2  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Geez I'd hope a blown 2v could run with a new Camaro. You must have run on an awfully conservative dyno to only see 330rwhp on 10lbs of boost. Also the L99's(auto) have been a big disappointment, they have been dyno'n at 330-340rwhp and trapping at 106-107mph max.

Last edited by 83gtragtop; 10-04-2009 at 09:39 PM.
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 09:46 PM
  #3  
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
Default

A lot of SS kills popping up here all of a sudden.
Stone629 is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 09:47 PM
  #4  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

This is no surprise! You have gears with similar power, and are several hundred pounds lighter.

Nice kill anyway!
mrtstang is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 09:52 PM
  #5  
Grabber
5th Gear Member
 
Grabber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 3,748
Default

How much did you beat the SS by?
Grabber is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 10:44 PM
  #6  
JT76
Moderator
 
JT76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,967
Default

your surprised you beat a stock auto camaro with a supercharged mustang? :/
JT76 is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 12:35 AM
  #7  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default

I don't really like the new Camaro, but I'm also not so biased as that I degrade a car solely because I happen to dislike it.

For right around *sometimes under* 30K dollars, you can have a high 12 second (for now, until more passes get made) with a full factory warranty.

That's just as, if not quicker, than the record stock LS1 passes. The motor has MORE capabilities as far as performance once modding begins. Look at LS3 numbers in Corvettes, that's scary ss****.

However, I suppose if you're surprised that a blown 2v GT with a set of DR's and a stall beat a stock '10 SS, then you're not likely to understand that logic above either.
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 01:32 AM
  #8  
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
tspence45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
Default

A blown 2v beats a stock '10 Camaro SS, and that means the SS is slow? I honestly don't think they're slow. A local guy set the bone stock record not long ago, at my local track. He hit 12.87 in ~1000' DA. Give it some more time, when we get down to around 0' DA, and even in the negatives, and it should run mid 12's. For a bone stock car, in its price range, that's hauling ***. Should make quick work of an LS1. With equal drivers, I'd say the new Camaro has a definate edge on the older LS1's, which it should anyways. No use in making a newer model slower than the last.
tspence45 is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 03:17 AM
  #9  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,565
Default

A car that runs 12's bone stock and traps over 110 is over hyped? Wonder how fast it would be if you throw 10 grand in mods on it like your car has?
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 05:01 AM
  #10  
00_buck
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
00_buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by JT76
your surprised you beat a stock auto camaro with a supercharged mustang? :/
don't know if it was auto or manual, didn't exactly stop and ask. He had a sweet looking transformers edition SS though.

Originally Posted by Grabber
How much did you beat the SS by?
i didn't but his bumper wasn't close to mine so it wasn't like .10 or .20 of a second maybe closer to .5 which is why i think it was a manual over an auto or maybe a slightly modded auto.

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
Geez I'd hope a blown 2v could run with a new Camaro. You must have run on an awfully conservative dyno to only see 330rwhp on 10lbs of boost. Also the L99's(auto) have been a big disappointment, they have been dyno'n at 330-340rwhp and trapping at 106-107mph max.
that and the saleen SC's just aren't that powerful when compared to the KB or Vortech. On a stock manual they dyno only at about 300 rwhp. i have an auto but if it were a manual it would be closer to 350 rwhp for me. I don't feed into power ratings too much, i just care how fast i get down the track and i've beaten cars with way higher power ratings probably due to upgrading my tranny and tires.

Last edited by Stkjock; 10-05-2009 at 05:13 AM. Reason: please use the multi quote feature
00_buck is offline  


Quick Reply: New Camaros are slow...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.