2011 GT on the dyno....
Jun 3, 2010 | 01:35 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 503
From: Florida
2011 GT on the dyno....
Jun 3, 2010 | 04:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,248
From: MN
Mike:
Nice Vid. So what were the before/after results from this test. Got any numbers you can share with us?
Jun 3, 2010 | 07:44 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,648
From: New York
I don't mean to sound like an ***hole, but what's the point of a dyno video with out numbers? Nice car btw and thanks for sharing though.
Last edited by Stang9946; Jun 3, 2010 at 07:53 PM .
Jun 4, 2010 | 01:56 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,688
From: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sonicx
Mike:
Nice Vid. So what were the before/after results from this test. Got any numbers you can share with us?
Yeah man, stop teasing us..
Jun 5, 2010 | 01:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 336
From: Nevada
Numbers? The first to market with a name brand tuner/intake combo and some solid gains has my $$.
Jun 8, 2010 | 10:00 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 503
From: Florida
Car made 367 rwhp stock.
So far we have seen some promising gains, but there is still more work to be done!
Jun 8, 2010 | 11:59 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,248
From: MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike@DiabloSport
Car made 367 rwhp stock.
So far we have seen some promising gains, but there is still more work to be done!
is that with a 93 octone tune?
Jun 8, 2010 | 12:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,688
From: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike@DiabloSport
Car made 367 rwhp stock .
So far we have seen some promising gains, but there is still more work to be done!
I expected a tad bit more but those are some kick a** numbers.
Jun 8, 2010 | 02:47 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 503
From: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sonicx
is that with a 93 octone tune?
Bone stock...90°+ heat...
Jun 8, 2010 | 11:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,248
From: MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike@DiabloSport
Bone stock...90°+ heat...
ehh that's isn't too far off then from what i expected as I was thinking low 370ish... so your numbers and were about spot on.