V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

hmmmm is this true?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #1  
firestarter's Avatar
firestarter
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Default hmmmm is this true?

from a reviwer from msn autos :


"My First Convertible"
2004 Ford Mustang Premium Convertible
10/15/2005
By: Young Again at 61
Owned: Less than 1 year
Review ID: #479891
9.7 Overall Rating

10 Styling
10 Performance
9 Interior
9 Quality
10 Recommendation



Pros:
Bought this baby "used" six months ago...the V6 with the automatic really gets you where you want to go in a hurry, the 460 watt 6-CD sound system is great, and there's nothing like a convertible...first one I have ever owned and my wife and I love it.


Cons:
I small rattle somewhere by the right rear window...but what can you expect from a convertible?


Overall Review:
This car rides and is more comfortable than my 1999 Ford Windstar, if you can believe that. Sure-footed, but not to the point where you feel every imperfection in the road. Put a fuel-saver device in the intake hose and get 28 MPG on the interstate plus 15 more horses! Can't beat that! I waited 40 years to own a Mustang...the wait was well worth it!

doubt it.....cuz i havent seen any fuel saving devices for the stang...my friend had one but for his wrangler and its all bull****..doesnt work.
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #2  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

if by fuel saving he means, CAI, exhaust, U.D pullies and a tune then thats all possible,
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #3  
firestarter's Avatar
firestarter
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

'Fuel-saver device in the intake hose' gave him 28mpg in the interstate and added hp , i doubt that its a cai...oh wait i remember a fuel saving device thats inserted in the intake it was one of those as seen on tv products.
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #4  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

no its bull chit
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #5  
firestarter's Avatar
firestarter
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

http://www.tornadofuelsaver.com/tfs/

this must be it....LOL
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

ya it dont work
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 01:02 AM
  #7  
edh1005's Avatar
edh1005
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

I got 30 mpg on a trip from Balt. to Hatterass with nothing in the intake. the only extra horses were the ones seen on the way there. lol
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?


ORIGINAL: edh1005

I got 30 mpg on a trip from Balt. to Hatterass with nothing in the intake. the only extra horses were the ones seen on the way there. lol
umm, not even a single-port will get 30 mpg so what did you have done?
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #9  
Dirtysouthstang's Avatar
Dirtysouthstang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 222
From:
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?

i have heard about the tornado dropin. i have even seen it at autozone. but i dont think it would work,
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #10  
ByPopularDemand's Avatar
ByPopularDemand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,766
From: UT
Default RE: hmmmm is this true?


ORIGINAL: mustangman02232


ORIGINAL: edh1005

I got 30 mpg on a trip from Balt. to Hatterass with nothing in the intake. the only extra horses were the ones seen on the way there. lol
umm, not even a single-port will get 30 mpg so what did you have done?
Prolly a long trip on the freeway



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.