Flamethrower Exhuast
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 429
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: Crsytal Ice
Thanks man, and ya....those wheels look f*cked up bad[&:][&:]
ORIGINAL: michaelbarry
NOT rice, in any way.
NOT rice, in any way.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 357
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
I don't see how, because i've been examining the picture for the past few minutes now, and I don't see how the camera angle could futk it up like that, because it actually shows it way out past the bumper cover, the camera couldn't do that. The camera COULD make it look futked underneath the car, but it can't make it actually look like it's sticking out past the bumper cover (from the front view) when it really isn't.
Actually, ****..I just typed all of that and realized that it COULD be the camera angle, because you could have taken it with the wheels turned slighty clockwise (from the drivers seat position) and been standing to the left (left as in the way you're viewing the picture)...damnit, i'm putting too much thought in to this.
Actually, ****..I just typed all of that and realized that it COULD be the camera angle, because you could have taken it with the wheels turned slighty clockwise (from the drivers seat position) and been standing to the left (left as in the way you're viewing the picture)...damnit, i'm putting too much thought in to this.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 75
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: michaelbarry
I don't see how, because i've been examining the picture for the past few minutes now, and I don't see how the camera angle could futk it up like that, because it actually shows it way out past the bumper cover, the camera couldn't do that. The camera COULD make it look futked underneath the car, but it can't make it actually look like it's sticking out past the bumper cover (from the front view) when it really isn't.
Actually, ****..I just typed all of that and realized that it COULD be the camera angle, because you could have taken it with the wheels turned slighty clockwise (from the drivers seat position) and been standing to the left (left as in the way you're viewing the picture)...damnit, i'm putting too much thought in to this.
I don't see how, because i've been examining the picture for the past few minutes now, and I don't see how the camera angle could futk it up like that, because it actually shows it way out past the bumper cover, the camera couldn't do that. The camera COULD make it look futked underneath the car, but it can't make it actually look like it's sticking out past the bumper cover (from the front view) when it really isn't.
Actually, ****..I just typed all of that and realized that it COULD be the camera angle, because you could have taken it with the wheels turned slighty clockwise (from the drivers seat position) and been standing to the left (left as in the way you're viewing the picture)...damnit, i'm putting too much thought in to this.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,447
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: 561boii
ok u might not think so, but everyones intitled to theire own opinions. and that one is mine.
ORIGINAL: michaelbarry
NOT rice, in any way.
NOT rice, in any way.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 312
From: CA
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
I know some company makes a kit for it, seen them install it on TV...It was pretty cool. As for flamethrowers being rice? they are probably the farthest thing from it. Flame throwers have been around before times if you bought an import you were declared a Commie or Un-American...So in other words flamethrowers on an american car is the most american you can get. The japanese just realized that it was awesome and started doing it too.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 429
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: BeachStang04
to bad its not rice it was on old hotrods are hotrods rice?!?!?!?!? point proven.
ORIGINAL: 561boii
ok u might not think so, but everyones intitled to theire own opinions. and that one is mine.
ORIGINAL: michaelbarry
NOT rice, in any way.
NOT rice, in any way.
well if it were fu(ked up what could it be?
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 357
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
If your wheels were fugged?..It would most likely be the car is just out of alignment really really bad. Maybe you had new ball joints or tie-rod ends (these can DEFINATELY do it) put on prior to this picture, and hadn't had it re-alligned yet?
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 429
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: michaelbarry
If your wheels were fugged?..It would most likely be the car is just out of alignment really really bad. Maybe you had new ball joints or tie-rod ends (these can DEFINATELY do it) put on prior to this picture, and hadn't had it re-alligned yet?
If your wheels were fugged?..It would most likely be the car is just out of alignment really really bad. Maybe you had new ball joints or tie-rod ends (these can DEFINATELY do it) put on prior to this picture, and hadn't had it re-alligned yet?
6th Gear Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,445
From:
RE: Flamethrower Exhuast
ORIGINAL: boss429
ok this thread has gone everywhere.
im also interested in this flamethrower thing...
anyone got an opinion on the best way to do it,
maybe some hack job diagrams?
ok this thread has gone everywhere.
im also interested in this flamethrower thing...
anyone got an opinion on the best way to do it,
maybe some hack job diagrams?