V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

powerpak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 02:48 AM
  #1  
dhuskers_11's Avatar
dhuskers_11
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 977
From:
Default powerpak

would it even be worth it to buy just the heads from supersix, because would it help at all not even having ported upper and lower intakes?
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 02:50 AM
  #2  
SpecterGT260's Avatar
SpecterGT260
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,003
From:
Default RE: powerpak

sounds like a much better deal to go with the whole kit. because heads alone will help, but not near as much as head, ported upper/lower, and cam
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 04:46 AM
  #3  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: powerpak

powerpaks rule. i picked up almost 35 rwhp on my car
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 04:54 AM
  #4  
NoChanceMRP's Avatar
NoChanceMRP
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 288
From: Cranston, Rhode Island
Default RE: powerpak

ORIGINAL: deezelnut

powerpaks rule. i picked up almost 35 rwhp on my car
How come SSM says up to 70, 80, 90 HP for each of the paks, and you only got 35?
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 04:57 AM
  #5  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: powerpak


ORIGINAL: NoChanceMRP

ORIGINAL: deezelnut

powerpaks rule. i picked up almost 35 rwhp on my car
How come SSM says up to 70, 80, 90 HP for each of the paks, and you only got 35?
that was on a supercharged car. had to have been. but, i have a lillte guy called vortech coming to help with my engine and another cool dude called N2O
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #6  
NoChanceMRP's Avatar
NoChanceMRP
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 288
From: Cranston, Rhode Island
Default RE: powerpak

Well that sucks. Why wouldnt they list that it was on a SC'd car?

Have you driven it yet? If you have, hows the difference?
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: powerpak


ORIGINAL: NoChanceMRP

Well that sucks. Why wouldnt they list that it was on a SC'd car?

Have you driven it yet? If you have, hows the difference?
i am in korea for another 9 months.[:'(] i have already been here for 3. i will hopefully be able to go on leave around january, in which i will race and destroy a proud GT owner
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #8  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: powerpak


ORIGINAL: deezelnut


ORIGINAL: NoChanceMRP

Well that sucks. Why wouldnt they list that it was on a SC'd car?

Have you driven it yet? If you have, hows the difference?
i am in korea for another 9 months.[:'(] i have already been here for 3. i will hopefully be able to go on leave around january, in which i will race and destroy a proud GT owner
the best
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #9  
jthorn9's Avatar
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,480
From: Temple, Texas
Default RE: powerpak


ORIGINAL: deezelnut


ORIGINAL: NoChanceMRP

Well that sucks. Why wouldnt they list that it was on a SC'd car?

Have you driven it yet? If you have, hows the difference?
i am in korea for another 9 months.[:'(] i have already been here for 3. i will hopefully be able to go on leave around january, in which i will race and destroy a proud GT owner
I'll race ya................................too bad I might have a brand new PI intake and heads.
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #10  
redass02gt's Avatar
redass02gt
EXTREME Moderation
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,895
From: BLAM-O
Default RE: powerpak

pi intake and heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.