Wow... I wonder what my slow 'Stang puts up there. I think some things are better off unknown...

 

Im not sure if you were talking to me or not but I had mine dynoed at GTR Mustang Performence in Riverside,CA (I think, dont remember right now).

Matthew

 

dam, you have def. lost some power through poor upkeep i bet.

 

Owning a California 2001 auto myself, I hate to say this but those numbers are probably accurate.

The Cal models suck. I'm TOTALLING GUESSING here, but I think they have about 145 or so at the wheels box stock.

Your 2 bolt ons won't gain you much.

I have a MANIFOLD spacer, homemade cai and a 25% ud pulley and it definitely runs better that it did before these things, but it still is nothing to write home about.

I know your feeling... [sm=smiley6.gif]

 

sad, i was laughing at civic ricers with 120HP, but just noticed that we're not much better. i hoped it has about 200HP

 

yeah ha sixers aren't to fast unless you put money into them for sure

at least most people who dont kow anything about stang on the road just assume they are fast ha

it'll beat a ricer but thats not saying much

 

i think some of our cars are slower than the others, especially the other v6s around my town.. none are even close to me for some reason and the only mods i have are CAI, duals, and short throw..

i was at the track, other v6s were running 17s and i ran 15.9 spinning half of 2nd gear

are there a lot of bad seeds or do i somehow have a winner

 

your time seems right on with the spinning in 2nd gear...

some people can't drive =) and some dont take care of there cars

 

well i guess this means i need to drop in a 4.6

 

4.6L SOHC V8 = waste of swap.

My test motor for the M112 dyno'd at 165 rwhp and 200 rwtq STOCK. Even had a stock airfilter and the silencer still on it.
Take the money you'd use for a swap, and make a higher powered V6.