V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Lets talk numbers...n/a V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #11  
Shaunmac9128's Avatar
Shaunmac9128
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,453
From: RI
Default

Yeah let me kno. Ported upper not windstar though right? And not cut and welded? Let me know what your numbers are. Anyone have an idea of a safe but good compression ratio for 93 octane?
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #12  
PNYXPRESS's Avatar
PNYXPRESS
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,952
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Seeing as the new 5.0 is 11:1 compression and rated to run 87 octane, I say you can probably do up to 12:1 maybe?
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #13  
WoahPony's Avatar
WoahPony
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 585
From: New Hampshire
Default

Heyy, totally new here, but I'm gonna chime in anyway. Add some lightweight pullies to that list. Nothing kills HP like a set of cast-iron wheels. I'm also gonna have to agree with the lightweight rims idea, even if its a difference of less than 100 lbs, youre going to want to shave as much curb weight as you can without starting to mess with pulling A/c and all that junk. And I'm also going to have to say stick with the aluminum drive shaft, the amount of money you'll save over carbon fiber will cover a good portion of the build. I'm totally new to Ford product and have just switched from Hyundai (shoot me) and I know Hyundai used throttle body coolant lines that seriously hurt performance. If this is a spring/summer car and you've got the coolant lines, plug them. you don't have to worry about the butterfly freezing up and it'll help intake temps.
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #14  
Shaunmac9128's Avatar
Shaunmac9128
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,453
From: RI
Default

I'm not having a carbon fiber driveshaft made no worries.
And I think you can go up to 12:1 but I think 11:1 might be better for a dd.
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #15  
crazyassracer's Avatar
crazyassracer
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 374
From: MICHIGAN
Default

Ran across this thread while searching info on truetrac diffs.
Dont know much about the 3.8s.
So the Windstar intake flows better than the stock Mustang intake?
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #16  
WoahPony's Avatar
WoahPony
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 585
From: New Hampshire
Default

12:1 would seriously affect drivability. It would be prime for an N/A track car, but lean closer to 11:1 if you're using this as a daily
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #17  
Shaunmac9128's Avatar
Shaunmac9128
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,453
From: RI
Default

yes it flows much better. And thats why I'm thinking 11:1. It will only be driven in the spring/summer. I will have another car to drive. But make no mistake, this will be a driver, not a track car. I'm not building it around the track it anyway. I'm doing what I want to it, whether it be body, engine, rims, etc.
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #18  
PNYXPRESS's Avatar
PNYXPRESS
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,952
From: Clermont, FL
Default

I didnt say to run that high of compression, just answering the question of "whats a safe compression for 93 octane." I would run somewhere around 10.5-11 if there are no f/i plans down the road.
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #19  
Shaunmac9128's Avatar
Shaunmac9128
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,453
From: RI
Default

Not if I build the n/a motor I want, no.
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #20  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default

11:1 4.2 or 4.3L with the right cam, good heads/valve train, ported lower, Windstar upper and get a good free flow exhaust set up.

SSM little fox coupe ripped 11's N/A. Kirk (I forget his screen name on 3.8M/V6P...Silver2000???) has an N/A vert that was running some good times.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.