Some specs & Comparisons
09-01-2004, 01:46 PM
#1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 508
Some specs & Comparisons
2004 Mustang GT
Weight: 3113 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual
Horsepower: 260 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Torque: 302 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Redline: 6000 rpm
0-60: 5.7 sec
Quarter: 14.1 sec @ 99 mph
Skidpad: .87g
Braking, 60-0: 120 ft
2003 Mustang Mach 1
Weight: 3420 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual
Horsepower: 305 bhp @ 5800 rpm
Torque: 320 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Redline: 6250 rpm
0-60: 5.2 sec
Quarter: 14.0 sec @ 103 mph
Skidpad: .85g
Braking, 60-0: 122 ft
2005 Mustang GT
Weight: 3425 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual/5-Speed Auto
Horsepower: 300 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 315 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Redline: 6250 rpm
0-60: 5.2 sec
Quarter: 13.9 sec @ 104 mph
Skidpad: .85g
Braking, 60-0: 116 ft
In brief, the 2005 Mustang GT will be heavier than the 2004's because of added safety equipment (to meet gov't standards) and larger size. However, the added horsepower still compensates for the additional weight making it faster in the 0-60 and quarter mile. The new GT is comparable to the Mach 1's as far as track times go. It is said the ride feels more "solid" than the 04's. Keep in mind, these were completely stock runs and the drivers capabilities, track conditions, etc. will affect times...
That's all I know...
Weight: 3113 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual
Horsepower: 260 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Torque: 302 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Redline: 6000 rpm
0-60: 5.7 sec
Quarter: 14.1 sec @ 99 mph
Skidpad: .87g
Braking, 60-0: 120 ft
2003 Mustang Mach 1
Weight: 3420 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual
Horsepower: 305 bhp @ 5800 rpm
Torque: 320 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Redline: 6250 rpm
0-60: 5.2 sec
Quarter: 14.0 sec @ 103 mph
Skidpad: .85g
Braking, 60-0: 122 ft
2005 Mustang GT
Weight: 3425 lbs
Trans: 5-Speed Manual/5-Speed Auto
Horsepower: 300 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 315 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Redline: 6250 rpm
0-60: 5.2 sec
Quarter: 13.9 sec @ 104 mph
Skidpad: .85g
Braking, 60-0: 116 ft
In brief, the 2005 Mustang GT will be heavier than the 2004's because of added safety equipment (to meet gov't standards) and larger size. However, the added horsepower still compensates for the additional weight making it faster in the 0-60 and quarter mile. The new GT is comparable to the Mach 1's as far as track times go. It is said the ride feels more "solid" than the 04's. Keep in mind, these were completely stock runs and the drivers capabilities, track conditions, etc. will affect times...
That's all I know...
09-01-2004, 06:18 PM
#4
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 508
RE: Some specs & Comparisons
ORIGINAL: matthockey32
where did you get those numbers? the v6 stangs weigh almost 3200 lbs and a GT weighs more than the v6.
where did you get those numbers? the v6 stangs weigh almost 3200 lbs and a GT weighs more than the v6.
09-11-2004, 10:50 PM
#9
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 2,042
RE: Some specs & Comparisons
a v6 weghs about 3300 lbs from factory, the GTs weigh about 250 lbs more. the 05 GTs are supposed to weigh within 100 lbs of the 04 GTs. and how is the mach1 so much heavier, there is not that much difference except in the engine.
