Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.90s or 4.10s?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2011, 02:10 PM
  #11  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke
And you think the 3.90's would make a difference on this that you would notice? If so... where do you get this thought from lol?
Did you even read my post? I thought you did since you quoted it, but it appears you didn't.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 08-10-2011, 02:59 PM
  #12  
wayne613
4th Gear Member
 
wayne613's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 1,596
Default

Originally Posted by Bmr4life
Constant 3k rpms is not for the faint of heart, which sucked because I liked going 80. I had to relegate myself to the middle lane doing 70mph or else my mpg would tank.
That's it, 1 man card taken away...

As to OP, ditto on Bmr4life's statement. 3.73 or 4.10 as I really wouldn't even consider 3.90, as they're not offered by FR(as also stated by others). From what you're saying, highway isn't an issue, so I'm another +1 for 4.10 FRPP all the way, which seems to be everyone's consensus.

Love mine. Even when I occasionally have to deal with it suckin' it down like an alcoholic at an open bar when on the highway for any prolonged period.

Last edited by wayne613; 08-10-2011 at 03:07 PM.
wayne613 is offline  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:11 PM
  #13  
adidasUNT8
3rd Gear Member
 
adidasUNT8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 977
Default

4.10's are fun, but if you plan on going FI at some point, I wouldn't recommend them at that point. They are fun on naturally aspirated cars, but you will just be sitting there spinning if you plan on going Supercharger/Turbo at a later time.
adidasUNT8 is offline  
Old 08-10-2011, 07:58 PM
  #14  
SON OF 68
2nd Gear Member
 
SON OF 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 473
Default

Agreed. I wanted to go 4.10's on my car, but was talked out of it.
1) I do a lot of highway driving.
2) I am going to supercharge the car.

The main reason they had for going 3.73 was the plans of FI. I'm still happy with the 3.73's as well. It's a nice all around gear, and pretty friendly on the highway. I still have a pretty good pull from 65-70 in 5th gear. At around 80 mph, I'm turning right about 2500.
SON OF 68 is offline  
Old 08-10-2011, 08:02 PM
  #15  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

The other problem I had with 4.10s was pull at highway speed. Punching it at 70mph dropped me into 4th and left me struggling to speed up. With the 3.31s, acceleration was way better at that speed.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 03:01 AM
  #16  
chris09
2nd Gear Member
 
chris09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Around the world
Posts: 236
Default

i say 4.10s if you stay under 450 whp, 3.73s if your over that. my first gear is so short and usless that somtimes i just skip it all together. highways with 4.10s is no problem for me. i can still do about 120 in 4th gear.
chris09 is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 03:23 AM
  #17  
Blacksmoke
The Paranoid One
 
Blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,320
Default

Yes I read your post...
Originally Posted by Bmr4life
I don't know about you, but I definitely heard my 4.6 singing on the highway. There was no question what speed I was going, especially if I got around 80mph. Constant 3k rpms is not for the faint of heart, which sucked because I liked going 80. I had to relegate myself to the middle lane doing 70mph or else my mpg would tank.
But I did not see where you stated what gear you went from to the 4.10's.
That is why I asked if you thought such a tiny difference in gear ratio would make a difference on the singing.

Now I saw just now you talking about 3.31's. That is quite a bump compared to the difference 3.90's to 4.10's would produce with singing.
Get what I'm saying? If he is choosing between 3.90's and 4.10's if there was that issue it would more than likely be present with BOTH gear ratio's since they are so close.

Are you feeling a little moody? LOL
A bit snappy there my friend.

Last edited by Blacksmoke; 08-11-2011 at 03:45 AM.
Blacksmoke is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 05:46 AM
  #18  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke
Yes I read your post...


But I did not see where you stated what gear you went from to the 4.10's.
That is why I asked if you thought such a tiny difference in gear ratio would make a difference on the singing.

Now I saw just now you talking about 3.31's. That is quite a bump compared to the difference 3.90's to 4.10's would produce with singing.
Get what I'm saying? If he is choosing between 3.90's and 4.10's if there was that issue it would more than likely be present with BOTH gear ratio's since they are so close.

Are you feeling a little moody? LOL
A bit snappy there my friend.
I'm not moody, but you're still not reading what I posted. Go back and read the very first line I posted (which you quoted). I said the same thing you're saying so I'm not sure why you keep defending how close 3.90's and 4.10's are.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:35 AM
  #19  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by BlackBeauty4.6
I don't do much highway driving and don't care about going high speeds I want to have ***** at bottom and some top end for the track or street against others.. And 4.10s were my first choice then 3.90s were but I hear that there's a lot of whine to 3.90s I just need som opinions please
There is only 5% difference between them, so rpms at any given speed and even acceleration isn't going to be hugely different. In virtually all cases, you might as well go with the FRPP 4.10's.

The only times you might choose 3.90's would be if you absolutely need to avoid an upshift that would be forced by the 4.10's but not the 3.90's, and there aren't very many situations where this is likely to occur.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 11:10 AM
  #20  
Blacksmoke
The Paranoid One
 
Blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,320
Default

Originally Posted by Bmr4life
I'm not moody, but you're still not reading what I posted. Go back and read the very first line I posted (which you quoted). I said the same thing you're saying so I'm not sure why you keep defending how close 3.90's and 4.10's are.
Ah I must have misread you. Gotcha.
I thought you were not comparing the closeness and just saying what you got with 4.10's vs. 3.31's.


My bad there!
Blacksmoke is offline  


Quick Reply: 3.90s or 4.10s?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.