Notices
2010-current S197 Appearance Section For all appearance mods to the 2010-2014 S197's

OEM hood scoops. Cool or crap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2012, 05:06 PM
  #21  
JimmyM
3rd Gear Member
 
JimmyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 505
Default

Yes, I like it. I saw someone who did hood spears but also blacked out the scoop. Looks insanely good and I had a "D'oh" moment where I thought damn maybe I should've just done that instead of getting a new hood.
JimmyM is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 06:11 PM
  #22  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

So, if a hood scoop is functional, it looks good? But the same scoop with no functionality looks like schit?
You guys logic is unshakable!

After all, a hood scoop is more for looks than anything else.
And it's been like that since the 60s! LOL.
I guess the 65/70 Shelbys and 69/70 Boss are ghetto car eh?
pascal is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 07:13 PM
  #23  
Order_66
2nd Gear Member
 
Order_66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Smithfield NC
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by Funster_2011V6
Hey guys. Been thinking about one of the OEM stick-on hood scoops. Haven't done any appearance mods in quite a while.

But since theyre non functional is they cool or is they ghetto?
100% Lame A$$ Ghetto.
Order_66 is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 07:17 PM
  #24  
Order_66
2nd Gear Member
 
Order_66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Smithfield NC
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by pascal

After all, a hood scoop is more for looks than anything else.
wait wait wait...what are you saying??

i suppose i should respect someone with 12000+ posts. you clearly know what youre talking about. but can you explain why you think this?

im not saying it isnt looks inspired, but is there not physics based logic as to why a hood scoop could be beneficial to the performance?
Order_66 is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 07:50 PM
  #25  
Andy13186
4th Gear Member
 
Andy13186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,792
Default

Originally Posted by Order_66
wait wait wait...what are you saying??

i suppose i should respect someone with 12000+ posts. you clearly know what youre talking about. but can you explain why you think this?

im not saying it isnt looks inspired, but is there not physics based logic as to why a hood scoop could be beneficial to the performance?
I think the amount of extra air pressure a functional hood scoop would allow the engine to intake would be neligible or would be cancelled out by the negative aerodynamic effects.

I like the looks of the hood scoops on the newer mustangs, but i think it would hurt the aerodynamics slightly. Mabe it wouldnt hurt the aerodynamics too much though since that air would have just been hitting the windshield anyway- windshield is smoother and slanted backwards though.

A bigger spoiler than stock looks wrong without a hood scoop

Last edited by Andy13186; 05-23-2012 at 07:56 PM.
Andy13186 is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 10:26 PM
  #26  
Alec
5th Gear Member
 
Alec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 4,256
Default

I personally hate non-functional scoops but that's just me
Alec is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:02 PM
  #27  
05MineralGrayV6
3rd Gear Member
 
05MineralGrayV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 718
Default

Funtional ram air scoops for the win Thats what I did

05MineralGrayV6 is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 02:06 AM
  #28  
JimmyM
3rd Gear Member
 
JimmyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by Andy13186
I think the amount of extra air pressure a functional hood scoop would allow the engine to intake would be neligible or would be cancelled out by the negative aerodynamic effects.

I like the looks of the hood scoops on the newer mustangs, but i think it would hurt the aerodynamics slightly. Mabe it wouldnt hurt the aerodynamics too much though since that air would have just been hitting the windshield anyway- windshield is smoother and slanted backwards though.

A bigger spoiler than stock looks wrong without a hood scoop
His response was to the idea that non-functional mods "look like ****."

A slap-on hood scoop is only for aesthetics, so why would its lack of performance gains make it look like **** compared to a function hood scoop.
JimmyM is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 03:21 AM
  #29  
audioAl
4th Gear Member
 
audioAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,044
Default

Mercy that's a sweet hood on 2011 GT 5.0, what a shot! I'd do a fiberglass replacement.
audioAl is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 03:37 AM
  #30  
wayne613
4th Gear Member
 
wayne613's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 1,596
Default

A slap-on hood scoop is only for aesthetics, so why would its lack of performance gains make it look like **** compared to a function hood scoop.
Why someone would care what everyone else thinks in any serious vein is beyond me, but I respectfully disagree with Pascal in that this lacks logic.

It's been a staple for a long while to at least at first glance, give it an appearance that it has a hood scoop, or side ones for brakes, etc...Doesn't however make it look good IMO after that split second.

Excuse me whilest I now go out and tack on cobra insignias, badges, and yank off my mufflers to give an initial appearance to my own GT. For an encore I shall put fake solar-panels on my house. Might make my neighbors like me a bit more, at least until I regale them with how it cuts down the cost of my meth lab, or they look for more than a couple seconds..


Last edited by wayne613; 05-24-2012 at 03:56 AM.
wayne613 is offline  


Quick Reply: OEM hood scoops. Cool or crap?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.