daily drivers
#1
#2
Disclaimer: I have no direct experience
From what I have read, on a DD the log will be better, as it will be less prone to cracking. I already have a Stinger header that isn't mounted yet, so I guess I will find out.
From what I have read, on a DD the log will be better, as it will be less prone to cracking. I already have a Stinger header that isn't mounted yet, so I guess I will find out.
#3
I've read that as well but was hoping I could get some personal experience to back it up. When are you installing you stinger header? Did you go with the center mount? Do you still have a/c? I've read that its harder to do center mount with you a/c on the car which is a must for this car
#4
I've read that as well but was hoping I could get some personal experience to back it up. When are you installing you stinger header? Did you go with the center mount? Do you still have a/c? I've read that its harder to do center mount with you a/c on the car which is a must for this car
#7
I've heard lots of cracking header stories too. I'm running a Bob's log on Thunderstang that I bought used. Holding up just fine. Got about 1500 miles on it so far, not counting whatever was on it prior to my purchase.
#8
The time I have on it has been great. No cracking, no issues to report. Flows pretty well, and I'm making some pretty good power with my set up as well. For as much a they get for the tubular headers, I would go for the log style header and save yourself a couple hundred bucks. On a daily driver, you wont notice the difference driving around anyways.
On a side note,
Evintho, I thought that 2.3 was on its way into a street rod. Change your mind or just haven't gotten that far yet?
#9
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3885845/1927-ford-model-t
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM