5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

h.o. vs normal 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2007, 12:00 AM
  #1  
black_89gt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
black_89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 673
Default h.o. vs normal 5.0

hey guys i have a normal 5.0 intake, not the H.O. that i was thinking about putting it on till i found out it wasnt an ho. is there any difference between the H.O. intake and the normal 5.0??
black_89gt is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:04 AM
  #2  
baysideblues
1st Gear Member
 
baysideblues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 68
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

I have a 94 and i dont think there is any difference just think it was something that they put on there
baysideblues is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:25 AM
  #3  
WhiteFoxGT
Resident Ford Troll
 
WhiteFoxGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,717
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

It should work fine, whats it look like? Only difference with those motors are firing order, heads (i think), and non-HOs is a non roller motor
WhiteFoxGT is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:28 AM
  #4  
FiveLiterRiceEater
5th Gear Member
 
FiveLiterRiceEater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,524
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

doesnt the intake point the opposite direction?
FiveLiterRiceEater is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:55 AM
  #5  
ooticamitica
4th Gear Member
 
ooticamitica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: broomall
Posts: 1,010
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

i thought they did because raquet ball ryans used to be opposite.
ooticamitica is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:30 PM
  #6  
hellas85stang
4th Gear Member
 
hellas85stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 1,082
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

5.0 is a 302 after it got the roller cam,ford started callin it 5.0 then.... i think the H.O 5.0 and reg 5.0 had different cams...
hellas85stang is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 02:24 PM
  #7  
89gtsleeper
2nd Gear Member
 
89gtsleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 335
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

I think the non ho were on backward, but it is still the exact same upper and lower intake. The runners all line up, so it doesn't matter which way you bolt the upper to the lower.
89gtsleeper is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 02:41 PM
  #8  
88MustangGX
2nd Gear Member
 
88MustangGX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Budd Lake NJ
Posts: 474
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

different cam. Intake manifolds are backwards as well.
88MustangGX is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 06:54 PM
  #9  
black_89gt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
black_89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 673
Default RE: h.o. vs normal 5.0

so i can use this one, and it will do the same thing as i have on there now? it wont lose power or anything?
what do you mean backwards, would i put it on the same way as the one i have on now?
black_89gt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
breaking
Audio/Visual Electronics
5
10-02-2015 01:27 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: h.o. vs normal 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.