Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Sponsored by Weld Racing


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2011, 01:21 PM   #11
04ShadowStang
2nd Gear Member

 
04ShadowStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Indiana
Posts: 319
officialmrbitter
Send a message via AIM to 04ShadowStang Send a message via Skype™ to 04ShadowStang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdderMk2 View Post
please dont give out any more advise.

OP, the E-cam is a horrible choice.

You should consider investing in a new shortblock, something with pistons that are notched for inline valved heads. then get yourself a decent set of heads (if budget allows). If you cant afford them, grab some GT-40 irons and select a GOOD cam. hell, even the TFS1 would be a better choice.
Mmmk... You're cool.

I was making a comment based on what I've read - I didn't actually recommend anything or give any advice, just reported that I've seen a lot of posts and in the real world - 5.0's with the E303 and they're all pleased.

I'm sorry that offended you lol

What's more... You didn't make a real recommendation other than telling the OP to choose a "GOOD" cam... So yeah, my bad for participating.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
"Scarlett" - 2008 GT - D3 Colorado "Torch" Red
Bullitt Intake, SR Performance Springs, J&M Upper/Lowers, J&M Panhard Bar, Eibach Sways

Last edited by 04ShadowStang; 01-21-2011 at 01:23 PM.
04ShadowStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 01:03 AM   #12
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alton, New Hampshire
Posts: 2,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 04ShadowStang View Post
Mmmk... You're cool.

I was making a comment based on what I've read - I didn't actually recommend anything or give any advice, just reported that I've seen a lot of posts and in the real world - 5.0's with the E303 and they're all pleased.

I'm sorry that offended you lol

What's more... You didn't make a real recommendation other than telling the OP to choose a "GOOD" cam... So yeah, my bad for participating.
Just fyi. The Ford racing cams are really outdated. 15-20 year old cam grinds that Ford hasn't changed in that long too. Any Crane, comp came, and even trickflow cams are far better then then the Ford racing ones. I'm not saying FRPP cams for the 5.0 are junk by any means, just outdated. There are far better.choices out there.
frdmstng1986GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 09:48 AM   #13
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member

 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 95 GT
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,785
Default

Well if u want better sound and dont wanna loose or possibly gain any performance just use the tfs stage 1 a dual pattern cam will give u more of the sound ur wanting. And may or mafy not change ur car from how if runs now. Since a stock e7 dosent need much more than a .500 lift u wil be fine.
On the other hand head result in more power and that in its self can change the sound of ur exaust.
Save some money and do a head upgrade, roller rockers, then if u still done like the sound change the cam.
Performance isnt all about sound.
Venomantidote95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 09:49 AM   #14
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member

 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 95 GT
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,785
Default

Ooops op max lift will be .530 if the duration is kept to a low with ur stock pistons!
Venomantidote95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 10:15 AM   #15
old83GT

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Vehicle: 1983 Ford Mustang GT
Location: PA
Posts: 7
Default

Well I liked the way the ford E cam ran. It had a mild rough idle and the car deff performed well. It might be old technology but I liked the way it performed and like they say, don't mess with what works. It would be a great cam for someone just starting to build cars.

Venomantidote95, you gave some good advice. I was planning on seeing how much I could port the stock heads but I prob will end up getting GT-40 or twisted wedge heads in the end.
old83GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 10:20 AM   #16
old83GT

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Vehicle: 1983 Ford Mustang GT
Location: PA
Posts: 7
Default

To 82 black sunshine,

I ran the E cam in my engine for 5 years. Never had a valve to piston issue. But yes they are pretty close. When I pulled the engine apart, saw no damage to pistons or valves.
old83GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 06:28 PM   #17
04ShadowStang
2nd Gear Member

 
04ShadowStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Indiana
Posts: 319
officialmrbitter
Send a message via AIM to 04ShadowStang Send a message via Skype™ to 04ShadowStang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frdmstng1986GT View Post
Just fyi. The Ford racing cams are really outdated. 15-20 year old cam grinds that Ford hasn't changed in that long too. Any Crane, comp came, and even trickflow cams are far better then then the Ford racing ones. I'm not saying FRPP cams for the 5.0 are junk by any means, just outdated. There are far better.choices out there.
There are plenty of chocolate bars since Hershey, but I seem to always go back to it...

It's a matter of preference, believe me - I know what you're talking about, I'm not saying you're wrong... What I am saying is simply, from the 7 people I spoke to locally at performance shops, as well as my 3 friends with 5.0's in this year range and set-up... That the FRPP/E303 never let any of them down.

It's up to the OP how he wants to roll... Old school lol or with any of the new car hoo-hah available... Like he eluded to though, perhaps the reason they haven't changed much - is because there isn't anything to change.
__________________
"Scarlett" - 2008 GT - D3 Colorado "Torch" Red
Bullitt Intake, SR Performance Springs, J&M Upper/Lowers, J&M Panhard Bar, Eibach Sways
04ShadowStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2011, 10:52 PM   #18
holyshift
3rd Gear Member
 
holyshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1988,Ford,Mustang
Location: Sandusky,OH
Posts: 893
Default

No the e cam pry hasnt let your buddys down......buuuut why not for the same money get a better cam?
__________________

88 Hatch,Long Rod 308(Scat crank,Oliver Rods,JE Pistons,9.7:1 comp),GT40 SVO Heads,Crane Cam,1.7 rockers,Port matched Vic Jr,650 Holley,plate kit,4r70w,custom converter,Best ET to date: 10.84 @122mph with a 1.45 60'.63n/51f
Yea Dude Racing Big Kid Racing
February 2012 UPR Ride of the Month
holyshift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 12:14 PM   #19
mjr46
Wal-mart lube/tire tech
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 29,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 04ShadowStang View Post
There are plenty of chocolate bars since Hershey, but I seem to always go back to it...

It's a matter of preference, believe me - I know what you're talking about, I'm not saying you're wrong... What I am saying is simply, from the 7 people I spoke to locally at performance shops, as well as my 3 friends with 5.0's in this year range and set-up... That the FRPP/E303 never let any of them down.

.
It's a matter of performance and achieving the optimal valve events for cylinder filling, when one says/ uses the word "preference" for how to choose a cam, there is serious lack of comprehension with how and what a cam does... there is more to it than just lift and duration, such things as lobe seperation and what does that mean and how does that affect a cams performance, ramp, rates and how does a cams design affect cranking compression vs overall.....ect ect and the list goes on...... and were talking camshafts not candy bars = two unrelated topics.......and it matters not what one says at a performance shop or blanket statements as such from friends that the frpp cams never let one down, that statement is and carries as much weight as an empty glass of water, empirical data/ ET SLIPS are what is needed to back up such a statement.........I've run the frpp cams in many set ups, did they run okay....yea but when a set up is properly matched, which I have now, it runs circles around the frpp combos......What it all boils down to is what one is willing to accept, and I agree that often compromises have to be made in the name of a budget, I've done it before, did the combo live up to it's full potential....no, was it okay, yes..........so if 169.00 dolla' camshafts are what fit your budget, try the tfs cams
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudegirl View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 12:24 PM   #20
mjr46
Wal-mart lube/tire tech
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 29,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by holyshift View Post
No the e cam pry hasnt let your buddys down......buuuut why not for the same money get a better cam?
of course it hasn't, the same could be said for tons of other cams, they work in and as far as the term goes to say that they all open and close the valves and allow the car to run...................I'll never forget my buddy after running his 90 gt at the track after a full h/c/i upgrade, = afr 165's ,rebuilt 306, e-cam, and iirc a ported cobra intake, best he could muster was a 13.3 @ 103/104.....needless to say he was not happy, at the time I had stock heads, small performer flat tappet cam and performer 289 intake and I was running 13.4's @100.....he expected to smoke me, and believe me I have more of these same stories from other friends, they were all the same happy and touted the frpp cams until they saw there was more out there, heck if all you ever ate in your life were the bugers at McDonalds then of course you might not know there are places out there that make far better burgers, do they cost more and taste better?? of course....in this world you get what you pay for
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudegirl View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 12:24 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
302, 50, 50l, cam, duration, engine, flat, ford, ho, lift, max, pistons, stock, top, woth

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup