Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1965 289 block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2006, 08:55 PM
  #1  
68SCode4speed
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
68SCode4speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wiscon-brrrrrr-sin
Posts: 490
Default 1965 289 block

Ok guys - I have a 1965 date coded 289 block. I was planning on finding a 302 block and building on it a 331 stoker but wanted to check and see if just using the 289 block would be sacreligious... Is that type of block rare / should I just keep it tucked in a corner/sell it or ?

Whatever motor I build it will be replacing the original motor in my C code (which I will just put in the corner and cover with plastic).

Thanks!
68SCode4speed is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:01 PM
  #2  
EmperorOfChicken
5th Gear Member
 
EmperorOfChicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,170
Default RE: 1965 289 block

i personally dont see anythin wrong with boring the 289 out myself, i've heard 331 is about right for a 289, but if you plan on going 347 use a 302. i plan on a 331 in the future for my car, but havent yet decided if i should yank the 289 and put in a 302 bored over. good luck with your decision.
EmperorOfChicken is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:02 PM
  #3  
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Soaring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,565
Default RE: 1965 289 block

As you know, the 289's were only produced for a few years, whereas the 302's were made for many years. Although they are the same block, if you can get a 302 to build for a race car, then save the 289 for nostalgic reasons, that is what I would do.
Soaring is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:14 PM
  #4  
68SCode4speed
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
68SCode4speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wiscon-brrrrrr-sin
Posts: 490
Default RE: 1965 289 block

That is what I have heard from a couple of folks but it has been split right down the middle mostly.. I think if I can walk into a 302 block then that is what I will use but still keep it to a 331 as the oil ring intersecting the wrist pin causes me too much grief when it comes to engine longevity.

Anyone else?? Bueller, Bueller...
68SCode4speed is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:20 PM
  #5  
66 stang
2nd Gear Member
 
66 stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 190
Default RE: 1965 289 block

id keep it if you have the cash to spare........
66 stang is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 12:13 AM
  #6  
eddithomas
 
eddithomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Default RE: 1965 289 block

I have a '68 302 that I'm looking to trade for a '65 289 should the results convince you to get rid of it.
eddithomas is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 12:20 AM
  #7  
mustanglover66
4th Gear Member
 
mustanglover66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 1,261
Default RE: 1965 289 block

not all 347 pistons intersect the oil ring. when we build one with forged pistons we use malhe which do not intersect the oil ring.
mustanglover66 is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 12:59 AM
  #8  
68SCode4speed
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
68SCode4speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wiscon-brrrrrr-sin
Posts: 490
Default RE: 1965 289 block

That I didn't know - I guess that the one I saw used the probe (?) pistons that intersected. Good to know that there is a different option on that stroker.
68SCode4speed is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 01:03 AM
  #9  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 1965 289 block

just get a late model 5.0 thats setup up for a roller cam and 1 piece rear main seal why build a stroker if ur not gonna go roller?
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:03 PM
  #10  
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,266
Default RE: 1965 289 block

My understanding is that 289's are not a good option for boring out...you are more likely to run into overheating problems. Thinner walls or such??

A good 289 block is a very very rare commodity over here. 302's are out there everywhere and cheap.

I'd go the 302 to 347 route personally...not a lot of difference in price for the kit is there? Why settle for enough torque to pull down an average house when you can just as easily have enough to tackle a small office block.
Aussie66Fastback is offline  


Quick Reply: 1965 289 block



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.