1964 1/2
#21
RE: 1964 1/2
ORIGINAL: ford65stang
Well i think you are doing the right thing......64 1/2 in any condition for 300 bucks.....damm good deal....and keeping the orignal motor in it and keeping it stock.... Once that is fully restored....You will have a nice piece of history...and it if you ever sell it....you will get lots of money.....you might break even, lol. Anyways Good luck!
Well i think you are doing the right thing......64 1/2 in any condition for 300 bucks.....damm good deal....and keeping the orignal motor in it and keeping it stock.... Once that is fully restored....You will have a nice piece of history...and it if you ever sell it....you will get lots of money.....you might break even, lol. Anyways Good luck!
but personally I dont plan to restore it and then sell it, I love classics always wanted one saw that chance to get a piece of history and grabbed it.
I like your attitude. I just hope you understand the massive amount of money and time it will take you to make that rust bucket into a driveable car.
#23
RE: 1964 1/2
I belive grant is right about it being a 66 looking at the some of the chrome, gas cap and quater panel ornaments and the dash gauges, 64.5-66 you sound determined to make it a nice road worth car so all credit to you and good luck with it.
#26
RE: 1964 1/2
No doubt, the car pictured above is a '66. A '64.5 model cannot be identified by any of the features cited in Jim Smart's article. Almost every feature either ended before the '64.5s ended or continued through into '65 production. The only true indicators of a '64.5 are:
1. Generator charging system (the pictures of the car above show an alternator - definitely not a '64.5).
2. VIN sequence number:
If it's a Dearborn car with a 2nd character of "F", any sequence of 250000 or below is a '64.5.
If it's a San Jose car with a 2nd character of "R", any sequence of 125000 or below is a '64.5.
If it's a Metuchen car with a 2nd character of "T", it's definitely not a '64.5 since Metuchen did not make any '64.5s
If your VIN starts with a "6", it's a '66 model.
You also mention a buck tag. No '64.5s had buck tags. If you mean the door warranty plate, post the numbers here and we can correctly decipher it for you.
1. Generator charging system (the pictures of the car above show an alternator - definitely not a '64.5).
2. VIN sequence number:
If it's a Dearborn car with a 2nd character of "F", any sequence of 250000 or below is a '64.5.
If it's a San Jose car with a 2nd character of "R", any sequence of 125000 or below is a '64.5.
If it's a Metuchen car with a 2nd character of "T", it's definitely not a '64.5 since Metuchen did not make any '64.5s
If your VIN starts with a "6", it's a '66 model.
You also mention a buck tag. No '64.5s had buck tags. If you mean the door warranty plate, post the numbers here and we can correctly decipher it for you.
#27
RE: 1964 1/2
Also, check to see if the VIN in the door warranty plate matches the VIN stamped on the inner fender. It's possible the car has a donor driver's door from a '64.5 with its corresponding warranty plate. The VIN stamped on the inner fender is the actual one for the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
10-01-2015 05:13 PM