Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs (Tech)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-23-2013, 02:02 PM   #1
MattSiple13

 
MattSiple13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Vehicle: 65' Ford Mustang
Location: NY
Posts: 4
Default 65' Mustang Dimensions

I am new to the forum but not to Mustangs. I am restoring a 65' I6 with my son. (I think a 289 is just too much for a "first car" )

I have been looking at the G.W. Liskey Diagram. In the diagram it has two dimensions for the width of the car. Towards the front of the car it has 54 3/4' and towards the rear of the car it has 55 1/2'. Is this correct?

Attached is the Liskey Diagram with the dimensions in questions marked.

Thanks,
-matt
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 64-65MustangFrame_Dim_hi.jpg (56.0 KB, 8 views)
MattSiple13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 03:05 PM   #2
jlg2002
4th Gear Member

 
jlg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1966 Mustange coupe
Location: Fontana, California
Posts: 1,481
Default

While i can't comment on those body lines. i can say the FSM shows the same dim's for the under body stuff like the frame rails. so i would postulate the dims are correct.
__________________
66 "C" code coupe bench seat
jlg2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 12:48 PM   #3
MattSiple13

 
MattSiple13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Vehicle: 65' Ford Mustang
Location: NY
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks...I thought perhaps I was missing something. So the back of the passenger compartment is actually 3/4 of an inch wider than the front. Who would have guessed.

Thanks again for your reply.
MattSiple13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 12:48 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1965 mustang, 65', dimensions, frame rails

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup