600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
#21
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
All I gotta say is good race I love that Evo it mad me wanna go get one and add it tp my collection, but I am gonna try for a Cobra instead but anyway that Camaro was outrageous the other Camaro it race jump on em but then the boost kicked in on that Evo but not this time, the Camaro won fair
#22
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
So a turbo is fair, but nitrous is not???
do you have any idea what that camaro would be running like with a turbo? Trust me his competition doesn't want that.
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
Nothin like sallys using fake HP right outta the bottle cause they dont wanna take the time and build up there engine the right way
ORIGINAL: FiveOhNo
wow, why is this kid still on this site...someone, please give him the boot. he's obviously here to do nothing but state insignificant comments and flame on every topic containing an import.
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
A 300 Shot, WTF
Evo woulda had him if he didnt spray
A 300 Shot, WTF
Evo woulda had him if he didnt spray
do you have any idea what that camaro would be running like with a turbo? Trust me his competition doesn't want that.
#23
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
#24
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
WTF are you talking about, a 93 GT?? Do what? We are comparing apples to sledgehammers now? (and btw, a 93 gt is pretty far away from "old school displacement" rofl)
Let me break something down for you. Power = Fuel. The more fuel you can compress into the engine while keeping the A/F ratio nominal, the more power you make. It really is that simple. The only think N20, turbos, and blowers are allowing you to do is smash more air in there, so you can spray in more fuel while keeping the ratio the same.
Oh there are other factors than size, such as how well the intake and heads flow, and what the compression ratio is, but it still is all about compressing a large amount of fuel alot while keeping the A/F on the safe side.
Now, which engine is it easyer to burn more fuel in, the larger one, or the smaller one? Which can flow more air both N/A and Boosted?
Which engine is better for making more power?
God, your like arguing with a liberal. No matter what the obvious proof is, no matter how well it is backed up, you still valantly hold on to your "facts" (everyone else calls it your opinion) blindly because whatever you think obivously is correct.
#25
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
Look at all the crap from the 80's all that damn smog crap just starting and trying to work their ways around it.
All the horrid flowing parts on that poor n/a engine.
Not to mention the low compression ratio compared to things of today
With a proper setup you can basically double the power of that stock 302 n/a
Try doing the same thing with that 4banger.
Oh, you can't. Only option is boost.
#27
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
God, your like arguing with a liberal. No matter what the obvious proof is, no matter how well it is backed up, you still valantly hold on to your "facts" (everyone else calls it your opinion) blindly because whatever you think obivously is correct.
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
Old school displacement always wins? NOT... technology is what wins dude.... Take the 93 GT for example, what did it have, like 205 HP stock? out of a 5 Liter V8 engine wtf? And now you have a RSX-S with half its displacement that has 210 hp stock
My $.02
#29
RE: 600awhp EVO w/55 shot vs Cobra vs Camaro
ORIGINAL: 98LS1
You're my new DSM buddy....and I heart you.
You're my new DSM buddy....and I heart you.