Cold Air Intake
#21
Ok, it sounds like I need to get the basics:
Pulley
CAI
Tune
Would the larger, 65mm throttlebody be a good idea?
Also, I want to get these cats taken off... will this affect my tune at all? I suppose I should have the 02s turned off in the tune rather than using the spark-plug non-fouler trick?
Thank you
Pulley
CAI
Tune
Would the larger, 65mm throttlebody be a good idea?
Also, I want to get these cats taken off... will this affect my tune at all? I suppose I should have the 02s turned off in the tune rather than using the spark-plug non-fouler trick?
Thank you
Speaking of tuning, either Justin at VMP or Jon Lund. Used a Lund tune with the stock blower, and when I upgraded went with Justins tune. It is spot on.... lots of power and perfect drivability.
And yes, 3.73s are great... don't waste your time on 3.55s.
#22
Get the rear O2s turned off in the tune and you will be fine. If ordering a CAI/pulley/tune combo. go ahead and get the big CAI. Personally, I would suggest either the JLT 123mm plastic or 127mm carbon fiber unit. Then, there is no need to upgrade if you ever buy a bigger blower... plus they will work better with your new throttle body. (make SURE to tell them about the TB when you get a tune)
Speaking of tuning, either Justin at VMP or Jon Lund. Used a Lund tune with the stock blower, and when I upgraded went with Justins tune. It is spot on.... lots of power and perfect drivability.
And yes, 3.73s are great... don't waste your time on 3.55s.
Speaking of tuning, either Justin at VMP or Jon Lund. Used a Lund tune with the stock blower, and when I upgraded went with Justins tune. It is spot on.... lots of power and perfect drivability.
And yes, 3.73s are great... don't waste your time on 3.55s.
#23
Apparently NEVER at the rate I'm going lol. I was supposed to run True Street at Bristol last month, but had a couple of minor issues with the car (PM me and I will give you the details). Ended up not making the race, and the car has been down for over 3 weeks now. Hopefully will be going back together soon, and will have a Thump tensioner and the new VMP 2.4" pulley. I was getting a little bit of belt slip before, so with the addition of the tensioner and smaller pulley I might pick up 3psi over what I was running before. So hopefully that will translate into some more ET & mph.
Also, the stock clutch is toast... it is getting hard to go into gear, and it feels like you have to stand on the pedal to get to the floor. SO, I am going to put a clutch in it before I take it back racing again, and I might add some long tubes too. Probably looking at early fall before I get any 1/4 mile numbers... the plan is to load it up in my buddys enclosed trailer, put some slicks on it, some good gas and crank the timing, and let 'er rip. I will probably take it back to the track on radials before then to get some 1/8 mile numbers though, that way I will see if the new clutch helped find some of the ET I am missing.
Also, the stock clutch is toast... it is getting hard to go into gear, and it feels like you have to stand on the pedal to get to the floor. SO, I am going to put a clutch in it before I take it back racing again, and I might add some long tubes too. Probably looking at early fall before I get any 1/4 mile numbers... the plan is to load it up in my buddys enclosed trailer, put some slicks on it, some good gas and crank the timing, and let 'er rip. I will probably take it back to the track on radials before then to get some 1/8 mile numbers though, that way I will see if the new clutch helped find some of the ET I am missing.
#24
I just can't imagine trying to plant all the additional power with 3.73's.....it was hard enough with the stock 3.31's, lol
I personally wouldn't consider the 3.55's or 4.10's....3.55's because I've always heard that if you're going to swap gears, you should always go up 2, which would put you in the 3.73's.....4.10's, IMO...just too much of a gear that you really don't need....but that's only my opinion.
#25
I HATE K&N!
I especially hate how they were advertizing such huge gains without a tune even back with the 05GT's.
Made me angry they were spewing crap out of their mouth and people believed it.
Even though they showed on THEIR dyno chart the gains I have NEVER heard of anyone getting NEAR the numbers they claimed for the "no tune" CAI.
Heck the tune is the major part of that sort of upgrade's power in the 05+
Mustangs.
I especially hate how they were advertizing such huge gains without a tune even back with the 05GT's.
Made me angry they were spewing crap out of their mouth and people believed it.
Even though they showed on THEIR dyno chart the gains I have NEVER heard of anyone getting NEAR the numbers they claimed for the "no tune" CAI.
Heck the tune is the major part of that sort of upgrade's power in the 05+
Mustangs.
#26
I got my 2.5" pulley, 90mm idler, JLT 127mm CAI, and tune from Justin installed this weekend. Now the car plants me back in the seat when I get on it... I love it.
The only problem I encountered was that the 90mm idler pulley seemed to be too tight of a fit under the intercooler lines. So, I placed it on the idler arm instead. Then I realized that it wouldn't have mattered, because the belt would have gone UNDER the red arrow pulley, not OVER it...
The only problem I encountered was that the 90mm idler pulley seemed to be too tight of a fit under the intercooler lines. So, I placed it on the idler arm instead. Then I realized that it wouldn't have mattered, because the belt would have gone UNDER the red arrow pulley, not OVER it...
Last edited by 04AZUREBLUEMACH1; 07-16-2012 at 09:32 AM.
#27
I got my 2.5" pulley, 90mm idler, JLT 127mm CAI, and tune from Justin installed this weekend. Now the car plants me back in the seat when I get on it... I love it.
The only problem I encountered was that the 90mm idler pulley seemed to be too tight of a fit under the intercooler lines. So, I placed it on the idler arm instead. Then I realized that it wouldn't have mattered, because the belt would have gone UNDER the red arrow pulley, not OVER it...
The only problem I encountered was that the 90mm idler pulley seemed to be too tight of a fit under the intercooler lines. So, I placed it on the idler arm instead. Then I realized that it wouldn't have mattered, because the belt would have gone UNDER the red arrow pulley, not OVER it...
#28
Yes, I replaced the pulley on the actual tensioner arm... the pulley there was the same size as the one at the top of the engine that I should have used.
#29
My car has the 10% OD balancer, and it was VERY tight with the stock tensioner. I actually just upgraded to the Thump racing tensioner with the smaller pulley for more clearance and better tension on the belt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-08-2015 11:50 AM