2002 T/A what will she do ya think??
#21
lol
sure he did
you really have a habit of leaving out mods in your posts
If I dropped a 4000 stall, slicks/skinnies, 3/8" rear raise, drag shocks/springs and 3.93's with a rear seat delete/trunk gut, I'd run high 11's... but in your eyes I guess the car would be a high 11 second GTO with just a CAI/tune
sure he did
you really have a habit of leaving out mods in your posts
If I dropped a 4000 stall, slicks/skinnies, 3/8" rear raise, drag shocks/springs and 3.93's with a rear seat delete/trunk gut, I'd run high 11's... but in your eyes I guess the car would be a high 11 second GTO with just a CAI/tune
Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 10-15-2010 at 05:21 PM.
#24
I've got a list running on this guy though so it's nothing surprising given the list
#1 this is the guy that says a 2V engine isn't any worse than a 3V or 4V engine and can perform just as well if not better
#2 he says they trap 102-104MPH and run mid 13's stock
#3 he says with basic bolt on's they are 12 second cars
#4 he says with a cam they can hit 11's
#5 he says with H/C/I they can hit 10's
among other very LOL worthy claims... that is part of the reason why his only responses since he got back from his vacation has been talking up the 2V.
but what luck... a long term member with an H/C/I 2V and supporting mods... tell me , you there, good sir, do you run 10's?
#26
If I were to race dyno's, I'd be surprised to see a mid 12 pass from your car. I know it was a MD, but judging by your pops numbers, he's only about 20'ish rwhp, depending on setup, away from what a dyno jet would read. So 320rwhp/300rwtq would be hard pressed to see low 12's.
#28
I'm not sure, I just know a simple bolt on and geared N/A 2V is not touching 12's like he claims they can... hell properly setup cammed ones have a hard time hitting 12's
I've got a list running on this guy though so it's nothing surprising given the list
#1 this is the guy that says a 2V engine isn't any worse than a 3V or 4V engine and can perform just as well if not better
#2 he says they trap 102-104MPH and run mid 13's stock
#3 he says with basic bolt on's they are 12 second cars
#4 he says with a cam they can hit 11's
#5 he says with H/C/I they can hit 10's
among other very LOL worthy claims... that is part of the reason why his only responses since he got back from his vacation has been talking up the 2V.
but what luck... a long term member with an H/C/I 2V and supporting mods... tell me , you there, good sir, do you run 10's?
I've got a list running on this guy though so it's nothing surprising given the list
#1 this is the guy that says a 2V engine isn't any worse than a 3V or 4V engine and can perform just as well if not better
#2 he says they trap 102-104MPH and run mid 13's stock
#3 he says with basic bolt on's they are 12 second cars
#4 he says with a cam they can hit 11's
#5 he says with H/C/I they can hit 10's
among other very LOL worthy claims... that is part of the reason why his only responses since he got back from his vacation has been talking up the 2V.
but what luck... a long term member with an H/C/I 2V and supporting mods... tell me , you there, good sir, do you run 10's?
lol
1- lies but the fastest n/a 2v is faster then the fastest n/a 3v 4.6
2-lies- i said high ~13.8 stick car
3-full bolt-on gear 12s yes
4-close have ran bottom 12s
5-they have went 10.8 with said mods and bottom end work
6- it is mustangforums sorry for defending one and not swinging of lsx nuts
lata
Last edited by bolton3valve; 10-16-2010 at 05:21 PM.
#30
I just don't see it being possible to run a 10 in a H/C/I 2v, even with bottom end work. More displacement doesn't really mean more power. Just a powerband lower in the RPM's. And you'll never get a New Edge Mustang light enough to run a 10 with the kind of power they make N/A.