The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

2002 T/A what will she do ya think??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010, 05:14 PM
  #21  
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,312
Default

Originally Posted by bolton3valve
yea he did... he went 12.8 @ 106 with just bolt-ons and gears
lol

sure he did

you really have a habit of leaving out mods in your posts

If I dropped a 4000 stall, slicks/skinnies, 3/8" rear raise, drag shocks/springs and 3.93's with a rear seat delete/trunk gut, I'd run high 11's... but in your eyes I guess the car would be a high 11 second GTO with just a CAI/tune

Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 10-15-2010 at 05:21 PM.
Morbid Intentions is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:18 PM
  #22  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default

Bolton is back.....

inafterdamorbid

Morbid, he was cam only. LOL
98LS1 is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 11:46 AM
  #23  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

So that car's gutted? What is its FULL list of mods??? (The stang)
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 01:00 PM
  #24  
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,312
Default

Originally Posted by mustangmancp
So that car's gutted? What is its FULL list of mods??? (The stang)
I'm not sure, I just know a simple bolt on and geared N/A 2V is not touching 12's like he claims they can... hell properly setup cammed ones have a hard time hitting 12's

I've got a list running on this guy though so it's nothing surprising given the list

#1 this is the guy that says a 2V engine isn't any worse than a 3V or 4V engine and can perform just as well if not better

#2 he says they trap 102-104MPH and run mid 13's stock

#3 he says with basic bolt on's they are 12 second cars

#4 he says with a cam they can hit 11's

#5 he says with H/C/I they can hit 10's

among other very LOL worthy claims... that is part of the reason why his only responses since he got back from his vacation has been talking up the 2V.

but what luck... a long term member with an H/C/I 2V and supporting mods... tell me , you there, good sir, do you run 10's?
Morbid Intentions is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 03:11 PM
  #25  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

Afraid id dissapoint him haha. No 10's for me. I haven't been to the track...but im thinkin mid-low 12s w/ a good tire.

Haha but i see where ur coming from.
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 04:08 PM
  #26  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default

If I were to race dyno's, I'd be surprised to see a mid 12 pass from your car. I know it was a MD, but judging by your pops numbers, he's only about 20'ish rwhp, depending on setup, away from what a dyno jet would read. So 320rwhp/300rwtq would be hard pressed to see low 12's.
98LS1 is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 04:32 PM
  #27  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

Well i think mid 12s are possible for sure if i hook and can hit the gears
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 05:15 PM
  #28  
bolton3valve
Banned
 
bolton3valve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MS
Posts: 723
Default

Originally Posted by Morbid Intentions
I'm not sure, I just know a simple bolt on and geared N/A 2V is not touching 12's like he claims they can... hell properly setup cammed ones have a hard time hitting 12's

I've got a list running on this guy though so it's nothing surprising given the list

#1 this is the guy that says a 2V engine isn't any worse than a 3V or 4V engine and can perform just as well if not better

#2 he says they trap 102-104MPH and run mid 13's stock

#3 he says with basic bolt on's they are 12 second cars

#4 he says with a cam they can hit 11's

#5 he says with H/C/I they can hit 10's

among other very LOL worthy claims... that is part of the reason why his only responses since he got back from his vacation has been talking up the 2V.

but what luck... a long term member with an H/C/I 2V and supporting mods... tell me , you there, good sir, do you run 10's?

lol

1- lies but the fastest n/a 2v is faster then the fastest n/a 3v 4.6
2-lies- i said high ~13.8 stick car
3-full bolt-on gear 12s yes
4-close have ran bottom 12s
5-they have went 10.8 with said mods and bottom end work
6- it is mustangforums sorry for defending one and not swinging of lsx nuts
lata

Last edited by bolton3valve; 10-16-2010 at 05:21 PM.
bolton3valve is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 05:25 PM
  #29  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default

GET THE **** BACK ON MY NUTS!!!! NAOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111222222222222222222
98LS1 is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 08:01 PM
  #30  
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
tspence45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
Default

Originally Posted by bolton3valve
lol
5-they have went 10.8 with said mods and bottom end work
I just don't see it being possible to run a 10 in a H/C/I 2v, even with bottom end work. More displacement doesn't really mean more power. Just a powerband lower in the RPM's. And you'll never get a New Edge Mustang light enough to run a 10 with the kind of power they make N/A.
tspence45 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2002 T/A what will she do ya think??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.