Notices
2005-2009 S197 Appearance Section For all appearance mods to the 2005-2009 S197's

Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2008, 03:37 PM
  #1  
tmsmith
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tmsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 565
Default Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

So, which ones? I am undecided... Need some help from the people that know them best.

Pictures would be nice too! I saw a couple (if not a dozen) of threads about these, but some of the pictures were not posted, or down.

So, either these: http://wheelskin.com/dg-3180.html

Or these: http://wheelskin.com/ro-401346.html

Which ones do you prefer? I think I like the non-Roush.

[sm=ttiwwp.gif]

Thanks!
tmsmith is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 04:43 PM
  #2  
oshkoshbajawsh
I ♥ Acer
 
oshkoshbajawsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,160
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

depends if u have money to spend or night. i like the roush better but i bought those cheaper ones
oshkoshbajawsh is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:04 PM
  #3  
kngdaka
4th Gear Member
 
kngdaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,622
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

I bought the cheaper ones myself. The Roush had two things going against them: price, and the fact that I think they look way too big on the cars. They still are a great mod, don't get me wrong, but not as retro as the cheaper ones to me.

Not my car, but thats a pic of them


kngdaka is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:12 PM
  #4  
Fred Malibu
4th Gear Member
 
Fred Malibu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,143
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Roushees EF TEE DUB. (FTW)..

If I had to choose to do it all over again, I'd either go Roush or just tint the back dark and leave em.. (maybe Saleen if I HAD to choose somethin.)

It depends on the look you want..



Saleen
http://haneymotorsport.com/saleen/05...moldinsLRG.jpg

Good luck.

Fred Malibu is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:25 PM
  #5  
Fallout
3rd Gear Member
 
Fallout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 499
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

roush all the way




[IMG]local://upfiles/82297/F3515154D29443B88B80C2822338FFA2.jpg[/IMG]
Fallout is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:43 PM
  #6  
pnicholson
2nd Gear Member
 
pnicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 343
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Hey there,

The problem is - its like a kid in a candy store. There are just SOOO many possibilities. Hard to choose.

Here are a couple of options for ya:

Street Scene Gen 1


Street Scene Gen 2


Street Scene Gen 3


Street Scene Gen 4 (Carbon Fiber Look)

And of course - Roush
pnicholson is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:44 PM
  #7  
Fred Malibu
4th Gear Member
 
Fred Malibu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,143
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Dont forget about cervinis..[8D]

(I still choose Roush..)
Fred Malibu is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:46 PM
  #8  
tmsmith
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tmsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 565
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Still very undecided.

I think the cheaper ones have a little more retro look. But those pictures Fred, are really nice looking. It may be your car though. :P
tmsmith is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 05:53 PM
  #9  
redhot06
1st Gear Member
 
redhot06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 70
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Roush!
redhot06 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 06:00 PM
  #10  
apbt426
1st Gear Member
 
apbt426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 115
Default RE: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers

Go Roush.. i love mine!!!! just keep searching for deals.. ebay.. craigslist , etc. i found mine painted brand new for $150!

apbt426 is offline  


Quick Reply: Roush Louvers vs. "Non-Roush" Louvers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.