Rear Wings
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 119
From:
RE: Rear Wings
All have the potential to look good, or look like ***.
Have to see it as part of the whole package.
I like the stock wing, the couple of ducktails out there, and no wing at all, depending on the car.
The only wing I can say I definitely hate is Ford's new stock one, that looks like it was accidentally left on the trunk when someone went to lunch.
No redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Have to see it as part of the whole package.
I like the stock wing, the couple of ducktails out there, and no wing at all, depending on the car.
The only wing I can say I definitely hate is Ford's new stock one, that looks like it was accidentally left on the trunk when someone went to lunch.
No redeeming qualities whatsoever.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 102
From:
RE: Rear Wings
ORIGINAL: okbfd
Stock wings fugly
Ducktail FTW
Stock wings fugly
Ducktail FTW
5th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,033
From:
RE: Rear Wings
I'm actually thinkin about putting a spoiler from an 86-88 Fiero GT on my car.. Before you laugh, go google for it.. I just tried, but it's real hard to come up with a decent pic. There's a guy around the corner who just bought a Fiero for a winter car, and it had a GT spoiler that came with it (but wasn't attached to the car). It looks more or less like the stock Mustang GT spoiler, but it's more like 6 or 7" from front to back, instead of only 3 or 4"..
I think it would look pretty good, and it would definitely be a one-off...
I think it would look pretty good, and it would definitely be a one-off...
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 210
From: Calgary, AB
RE: Rear Wings
I went with the OEM GT500 wing. I think it looks way better than theoriginal wing (at least on my car and most of the rides I've seen on this forum) and it's an easy replacement using the original 4 bolt holes.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,602
From:
RE: Rear Wings
ORIGINAL: Rat GT
I went with the OEM GT500 wing. I think it looks way better than theoriginal wing (at least on my car and most of the rides I've seen on this forum) and it's an easy replacement using the original 4 bolt holes.
I went with the OEM GT500 wing. I think it looks way better than theoriginal wing (at least on my car and most of the rides I've seen on this forum) and it's an easy replacement using the original 4 bolt holes.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,888
From: OK
RE: Rear Wings
ORIGINAL: BlackStang21
How tall is the Cervinis rear wing? I've been considering on changing my spoiler after awhile and was considering the Cervinis duck tail but someone told me that it sits very high up off the trunk and is difficult to see over out of the rear window. Is this true? I understand it'll probably be more difficult than the stock wing, but how much?
How tall is the Cervinis rear wing? I've been considering on changing my spoiler after awhile and was considering the Cervinis duck tail but someone told me that it sits very high up off the trunk and is difficult to see over out of the rear window. Is this true? I understand it'll probably be more difficult than the stock wing, but how much?
4th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,726
From: Illinois
RE: Rear Wings
The stock wing looks like it came off an 80's Firebird
The stock spolier is designed like the 1969-1970 spoiler.
The big fat *** on these cars looks very awkward without a spoiler.