Vert worth it? Topless or not
08-26-2007, 08:14 AM
#81
Retired Mod
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,658
RE: Vert worth it? Topless or not
ORIGINAL: Mudbus
Ya but sexy as hell to who? And what kind are you getting these "nice ride" comments from? Read between the lines tiger.
ORIGINAL: Stkjock
[sm=funnypostabove.gif]
These cars are sexy as hell in a vert.... I get stares and thumbs up not to mention the "cool" car or "nice ride" type comments all the time......
err, right then....btw - your village called, their idiot is missing.
These cars are sexy as hell in a vert.... I get stares and thumbs up not to mention the "cool" car or "nice ride" type comments all the time......
All kinds of people..... from guys and girls......no lines to read between here my sexually repressed friend.....
08-26-2007, 09:06 AM
#82
MF Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,191
RE: Vert worth it? Topless or not
FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD-
Would everybody get back to answering the OP's original question??? If you wanna talk about the sexual orientation of members, please visit Off-Topic
ORIGINAL: daveyb420
I have been reading alot of threads on this forum, some very good info. For anyone thats had a vert, is it worth the xtra coin? I really like the black vert, but the safety thing kinda worries me for a rollover. I'm like 6'2, not sure if I can duck under it like the other guy who wrecked his did.
Anyway would like some opinions on the vert GT. I test drove one and dirt was flying in my eyes. But the car was sitting waaaaay back in the sold lot caked in dirt. He said it was black, i said i dont think so. Was tungsten or something, just filthy though. Brand new at like $36,000, I lol'ed at that price.
I have been reading alot of threads on this forum, some very good info. For anyone thats had a vert, is it worth the xtra coin? I really like the black vert, but the safety thing kinda worries me for a rollover. I'm like 6'2, not sure if I can duck under it like the other guy who wrecked his did.
Anyway would like some opinions on the vert GT. I test drove one and dirt was flying in my eyes. But the car was sitting waaaaay back in the sold lot caked in dirt. He said it was black, i said i dont think so. Was tungsten or something, just filthy though. Brand new at like $36,000, I lol'ed at that price.
08-26-2007, 09:57 AM
#84
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,006
RE: Vert worth it? Topless or not
Thanks, I will go for the last word; as you said, read the posts. I never posted anything about class, that was someone else. I just pointed out your comment about how that post insulted GT coupe owners and asked for clarification on why it was only insulting to GT owners. Does this imply V6's can't be bad ***? Or does this mean V6's can't be classless? No pissing contest, just trying to clarify.
ORIGINAL: richmod
Whatever dude, I think I've clarified my opinion, which is thatcoupes are MORE aggressive in appearance than the vert. Just my opinion, everyone's is different. Your class comment has yet to be clarified, and to be honest, I could care less at this point. If it makes you feel better to get the last word in an internet pissing contest, go right ahead.
ORIGINAL: beaustang
Yes I read your post, did you? You said "If you think only classless people drive bad *** GT's you've insulted a lot of people......
See where someone might think you're talking about GT's being the bad *** cars in question?
Yes I read your post, did you? You said "If you think only classless people drive bad *** GT's you've insulted a lot of people......
See where someone might think you're talking about GT's being the bad *** cars in question?
ORIGINAL: richmod
Did you not read my post? I said a bad a$$ vert would look more bad a$$ if it was a coupe, IMO. And I never made the GT differentiation, you did. It has nothing to do with scoops/stripes/etc, of which I have none. It has to do with the overall design of the car, which in my opinion flows better and is more agressive in the coupe. Convertibles just look like half a car to me.
My opinions were all about the car, not the class of those driving it.
ORIGINAL: beaustang
So are you saying only a coupe and only a GT coupe can be bad ***? If so you've just insulted about 70% of all Mustang owners.
What is your definition of "bad ***"? A bunch of scoops and stripes? Please clarify.
So are you saying only a coupe and only a GT coupe can be bad ***? If so you've just insulted about 70% of all Mustang owners.
What is your definition of "bad ***"? A bunch of scoops and stripes? Please clarify.
ORIGINAL: richmod
What does class have to do with it? If you think only classless people drive bad a$$ GT's, you've just insulted alot of people on these boards. I'll assume you were kidding.
Perhaps I should rephrase: I've never seen a bad a$$ vert that wouldn't look more bad a$$ as a coupe. I like the vert - I came very close to buying one. But I decided that I wanted this car to be the bad a$$ muscle car that I never had when I was younger. And everytime I pictured that car in my head, it was a coupe.
ORIGINAL: Tri C
Might that be because class and bad a$$ are mutually exclusive?
Might that be because class and bad a$$ are mutually exclusive?
Perhaps I should rephrase: I've never seen a bad a$$ vert that wouldn't look more bad a$$ as a coupe. I like the vert - I came very close to buying one. But I decided that I wanted this car to be the bad a$$ muscle car that I never had when I was younger. And everytime I pictured that car in my head, it was a coupe.
My opinions were all about the car, not the class of those driving it.
08-26-2007, 11:02 AM
#85
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 146
RE: Vert worth it? Topless or not
ORIGINAL: daveyb420
I have been reading alot of threads on this forum, some very good info. For anyone thats had a vert, is it worth the xtra coin? I really like the black vert, but the safety thing kinda worries me for a rollover. I'm like 6'2, not sure if I can duck under it like the other guy who wrecked his did.
Anyway would like some opinions on the vert GT. I test drove one and dirt was flying in my eyes. But the car was sitting waaaaay back in the sold lot caked in dirt. He said it was black, i said i dont think so. Was tungsten or something, just filthy though. Brand new at like $36,000, I lol'ed at that price.
I have been reading alot of threads on this forum, some very good info. For anyone thats had a vert, is it worth the xtra coin? I really like the black vert, but the safety thing kinda worries me for a rollover. I'm like 6'2, not sure if I can duck under it like the other guy who wrecked his did.
Anyway would like some opinions on the vert GT. I test drove one and dirt was flying in my eyes. But the car was sitting waaaaay back in the sold lot caked in dirt. He said it was black, i said i dont think so. Was tungsten or something, just filthy though. Brand new at like $36,000, I lol'ed at that price.
ohnoesaz mentioned that he hates people looking at him in his car. When we're driving our Mustang convertible folks will look at us and wave or give us thumbs up. Others will pull up along side of us at a stop light and start talking about how much they like our Mustang. If this sort of thing make you uncomfortable or you don't like strangers coming up and talking to you, then maybe a Mustang convertible is not for you. Just owning a Mustang period makes people want to talk with you. Folks enjoy talking about their Mustangs they owned years ago, or some woman will say that her first boyfriend used to take her out in his Mustang. People have a lot of good memories associated with Mustangs and they like to share them with you.
Thanks Parva for posting the pictures of the classic convertibles you and your family have owned. I really enjoyed looking at them.
Davey, it's not a question of what's better. It's about what you enjoy driving. Convertibles aren't for everybody. Rent one and drive it for awhile. Then you can make an informed decision.
08-26-2007, 11:15 AM
#86
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,138
RE: Vert worth it? Topless or not
ORIGINAL: beaustang
Thanks, I will go for the last word; as you said, read the posts. I never posted anything about class, that was someone else. I just pointed out your comment about how that post insulted GT coupe owners and asked for clarification on why it was only insulting to GT owners. Does this imply V6's can't be bad ***? Or does this mean V6's can't be classless? No pissing contest, just trying to clarify.
Thanks, I will go for the last word; as you said, read the posts. I never posted anything about class, that was someone else. I just pointed out your comment about how that post insulted GT coupe owners and asked for clarification on why it was only insulting to GT owners. Does this imply V6's can't be bad ***? Or does this mean V6's can't be classless? No pissing contest, just trying to clarify.
ORIGINAL: richmod
Whatever dude, I think I've clarified my opinion, which is thatcoupes are MORE aggressive in appearance than the vert. Just my opinion, everyone's is different. Your class comment has yet to be clarified, and to be honest, I could care less at this point. If it makes you feel better to get the last word in an internet pissing contest, go right ahead.
ORIGINAL: beaustang
Yes I read your post, did you? You said "If you think only classless people drive bad *** GT's you've insulted a lot of people......
See where someone might think you're talking about GT's being the bad *** cars in question?
Yes I read your post, did you? You said "If you think only classless people drive bad *** GT's you've insulted a lot of people......
See where someone might think you're talking about GT's being the bad *** cars in question?
ORIGINAL: richmod
Did you not read my post? I said a bad a$$ vert would look more bad a$$ if it was a coupe, IMO. And I never made the GT differentiation, you did. It has nothing to do with scoops/stripes/etc, of which I have none. It has to do with the overall design of the car, which in my opinion flows better and is more agressive in the coupe. Convertibles just look like half a car to me.
My opinions were all about the car, not the class of those driving it.
ORIGINAL: beaustang
So are you saying only a coupe and only a GT coupe can be bad ***? If so you've just insulted about 70% of all Mustang owners.
What is your definition of "bad ***"? A bunch of scoops and stripes? Please clarify.
So are you saying only a coupe and only a GT coupe can be bad ***? If so you've just insulted about 70% of all Mustang owners.
What is your definition of "bad ***"? A bunch of scoops and stripes? Please clarify.
ORIGINAL: richmod
What does class have to do with it? If you think only classless people drive bad a$$ GT's, you've just insulted alot of people on these boards. I'll assume you were kidding.
Perhaps I should rephrase: I've never seen a bad a$$ vert that wouldn't look more bad a$$ as a coupe. I like the vert - I came very close to buying one. But I decided that I wanted this car to be the bad a$$ muscle car that I never had when I was younger. And everytime I pictured that car in my head, it was a coupe.
ORIGINAL: Tri C
Might that be because class and bad a$$ are mutually exclusive?
Might that be because class and bad a$$ are mutually exclusive?
Perhaps I should rephrase: I've never seen a bad a$$ vert that wouldn't look more bad a$$ as a coupe. I like the vert - I came very close to buying one. But I decided that I wanted this car to be the bad a$$ muscle car that I never had when I was younger. And everytime I pictured that car in my head, it was a coupe.
My opinions were all about the car, not the class of those driving it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
