2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Interstate drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #11  
owero01's Avatar
owero01
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,083
From: MD
Default RE: Interstate drivers

At 65, I get 27-28. At 80 I get 24 and thats without cruise control.
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #12  
GT Newbie's Avatar
GT Newbie
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 983
From: New Jersey
Default RE: Interstate drivers

ORIGINAL: thaztrain35

yeah but who drives a mustang 55-65 miles per hour[:'(] lol...


Well, I'm not admitting to breaking any laws, but I do believe that some folks drive their Mustangs 55- 65 miles per hour- but mostly in 35-40 zones..........
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #13  
thaztrain35's Avatar
thaztrain35
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 330
From:
Default RE: Interstate drivers

ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V

ORIGINAL: thaztrain35

yeah but who drives a mustang 55-65 miles per hour[:'(] lol...
I do for the most part on really long trips...less rock chips and less gas consumption...this isnt to say that dont punch it to 100+mph when it's necessary
i keep my baby local.. so no long trips for her
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 04:25 AM
  #14  
Tormentor's Avatar
Tormentor
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 464
From: Illinois
Default RE: Interstate drivers

I have an 07 GT Auto with a 373 gear installed and lately I have been averaging about 18 to 19 miles per gallon between fill ups, Thats setting the cruiz at 65. I dont see how you guys are getting that kind of milage.
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 04:34 AM
  #15  
dewittalday's Avatar
dewittalday
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 44
From:
Default RE: Interstate drivers

I'm bored off my @ss tonite, so that's my excuse for the following (plus I'm a dorky engineer)...

The drag force caused by air resistance is directly proportional to velocity (speed) squared. This means that gas mileage should decrease more as you go faster (not at the same rate you increase speed). Basically you need more engine power to keep a constant speed as you go faster, and more engine power typically equates to more gas consumption. The drag force is more pronounced at higher speeds (60+ mph), so going slower than that doesn't have as much affect (regarding drag).

With that being said, let's do an example. My assumptions are that gas mileage (mpg) decreases 5% for every 5 mph over 60 mph, and the gas mileage starts at 25 mpg at 60 mph. I also assume that you are not drafting a big rig.

Trip distance = 300 miles
Gas price = $3.50 per gallon

speed (mph): 60 65 70 75 80
time (hrs): 5.0 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8
mileage (mpg): 25.0 23.8 22.6 21.4 20.4
gallons used: 12.0 12.6 13.3 14.0 14.7
total cost: $42.00 $44.21 $46.54 $48.99 $51.56

I think these numbers are close to realistic. I have seen 25-27 mpg when cruising on the highway at 60 mph, and 22-24 when going faster than that (65-70).

So, is it worth an extra $9.56 to get to your destination 1.2 hrs (1 hr, 12 min) faster by going 80 instead of 60? Keep in mind my price of gas is slightly on the high side, so total cost would be a little lower as you go faster.

You could even do a "risk-vs-reward" cost analysis to figure out if speeding is actually worth it, even if you get at ticket. In other words, you could figure out chances of getting caught, how much the ticket would be, how much insurance would go up, how much time you'd save by speeding, etc.

Disclaimer: I am not promoting illegal activities, and I do not assume liability for anyone caught speeding!
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #16  
22kart22's Avatar
22kart22
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,885
From:
Default RE: Interstate drivers

Wow! Very nice man!
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #17  
jlaurens06gt's Avatar
jlaurens06gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 408
From: Greater Philadelphia area
Default RE: Interstate drivers

ORIGINAL: dewittalday

I'm bored off my @ss tonite, so that's my excuse for the following (plus I'm a dorky engineer)...

The drag force caused by air resistance is directly proportional to velocity (speed) squared. This means that gas mileage should decrease more as you go faster (not at the same rate you increase speed). Basically you need more engine power to keep a constant speed as you go faster, and more engine power typically equates to more gas consumption. The drag force is more pronounced at higher speeds (60+ mph), so going slower than that doesn't have as much affect (regarding drag).

With that being said, let's do an example. My assumptions are that gas mileage (mpg) decreases 5% for every 5 mph over 60 mph, and the gas mileage starts at 25 mpg at 60 mph. I also assume that you are not drafting a big rig.

Trip distance = 300 miles
Gas price = $3.50 per gallon

speed (mph): 60 65 70 75 80
time (hrs): 5.0 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8
mileage (mpg): 25.0 23.8 22.6 21.4 20.4
gallons used: 12.0 12.6 13.3 14.0 14.7
total cost: $42.00 $44.21 $46.54 $48.99 $51.56

I think these numbers are close to realistic. I have seen 25-27 mpg when cruising on the highway at 60 mph, and 22-24 when going faster than that (65-70).

So, is it worth an extra $9.56 to get to your destination 1.2 hrs (1 hr, 12 min) faster by going 80 instead of 60? Keep in mind my price of gas is slightly on the high side, so total cost would be a little lower as you go faster.

You could even do a "risk-vs-reward" cost analysis to figure out if speeding is actually worth it, even if you get at ticket. In other words, you could figure out chances of getting caught, how much the ticket would be, how much insurance would go up, how much time you'd save by speeding, etc.

Disclaimer: I am not promoting illegal activities, and I do not assume liability for anyone caught speeding!
Interesting. On a separate note, the way small planes measure fuel consumption is in Gallons per Hour, since measuring absolute distance covered is virtually impossible (relative distance is easy, airport A and airport B are exactly x miles apart, but this does not cover extra distance spent in say approach patterns, or course deviations for wind.) In your hypothetical scenario our machines have an operating range of 2.4 gph and 3.8 gph (in the 60mph to 80 mph band), which is a large range from arelative perspective.

I wonder how this might compare to agressive driving conditions such as road course or strip.

Ok, I will stop....
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #18  
Ringo01's Avatar
Ringo01
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 444
From: Pensacola NAS, Florida
Default RE: Interstate drivers

I Drive on the highway a lot... I found I get 26 to 28 mpg at 75 mph, any higher it drops down... I never drive really any slower... so i can't help with that.

I try to average 75 - 80 for best fuel economy and getting to where I'm going in a decent time.
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #19  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default RE: Interstate drivers

Before the turbo I would get 21.5 mpg @78 mph. If I cruised between 55-67 I would get 24ish. This was with 4.10's 295/35/18's, JLT2 and an SCT tune.

After the turbo I get 25.5 at 70 and 24.8-25.0 @ 80. I did get 26.5 @ 80 the other day but I may had a tail wind. This is still with the 4.10's.
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #20  
05 Mustang's Avatar
05 Mustang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,005
From: Canton, Georgia
Default RE: Interstate drivers

with the cruise set @ +/-65mph, I get around 27.7mpg and @ +/-85mph, I get around 25.5mpg

[IMG]local://upfiles/50057/CC730DEC80B8452F942111676451D3D3.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/50057/BF40FAC3D15C47C9ACD72969B6BAE185.jpg[/IMG]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.