Thats what the dyno saidwith Stingers.

As I told daniel60 when I was talking to him, I know Loudmouths loose some torque, but perhaps the hp is throwing you on that too?

Does that really sound off? [&:]

 

I don't have a clue what I have but it isn't enough. Nel that is an awesome Mustang. Is that a shaker underneath your hood?

 

www.revhardinc.com (Rock Island, IL) is it an inaccurate reading?

 

Bone stock I was throwing down 266 hp and 276 Ft/lbs. Can't say as of yet what I am pushing, but my ET's are suggesting 305-310 at the rear wheels.

Nels, it sounds about right for a Crank HP number. There are guys going full bolt ons and cams, and getting numbers only slightly higher than what your claiming at the wheels with just an Airraid CAI. Stingers really don't add anything HP wise. Every Axleback I have seen dynoed only shows a +/- 1 or 2 hp and torque. The custom H won't really do much either, unless it's got no Cats, in which case, again, I say your number sounds dead nuts on for a Crank HP number.

 

Is it normal not to get one of those graphs with your dyno results?

 

No dude your car is awesome others are scammed because they don't own one.

 

Haha. Dude you didnt offend me!! You don't need to be that way!

 

its completely in accurate IMO, that is why i asked on the other thread......with CAI and NO TUNE and h pipe you might have 280-285 rwhp.....stock our cars are around 260-265 rwhp with a manual, autos 10 HP less generally on a dynojet.....323 might be a projected crank HP but that is not what you will ever hear people quote when asked about their HP.

I suggest finding a different place cause that shop is feeding you BS on a platter honestly

 

Inaccurate readings, well that sucks. lol

 

whippled out