Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2008, 09:46 AM
  #21  
boochy
CSMG Moderator
Thread Starter
 
boochy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 1,729
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

Let's throw functionality out the window for a second. Do you LIKE the LOOK of the spoiler(Steeda, not the oversized race one in the first picture I showed). I'm happy with my GT500 spoiler, but I also like the race look of the Steeda.
boochy is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 09:47 AM
  #22  
boochy
CSMG Moderator
Thread Starter
 
boochy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 1,729
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

double post
boochy is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 09:56 AM
  #23  
mynameismike65
4th Gear Member
 
mynameismike65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,110
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

IMO the big spoilers belong on Civic Hatches[:@]I personally like the spoilerless look the best
mynameismike65 is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:02 AM
  #24  
LX200
4th Gear Member
 
LX200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,268
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

And, if you are really looking for one of these spoilers to really be functional, and really add rear downforce, then you need to be concerned with the total downforce balance of the car. Add a bunch of downforce to the rear, without corresponding downforce changes up front, and you end up with terminal understeer, which will make things WORSE at the track. And for 1/4 mile work, you don't want a wing adding a bunch of drag.
LX200 is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:02 AM
  #25  
Feng Houzi
3rd Gear Member
 
Feng Houzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 784
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancements... if the item is installed for appearance, then it is rice... if you are utilizing the item for what is does... such as a wing like that for racingthen it isn't rice... check this out... just thought it was funny...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riced_out
Feng Houzi is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:09 AM
  #26  
Devil Wolf
3rd Gear Member
 
Devil Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 777
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

ORIGINAL: Feng Houzi

Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancements... if the item is installed for appearance, then it is rice... if you are utilizing the item for what is does... such as a wing like that for racingthen it isn't rice... check this out... just thought it was funny...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riced_out
XD

Devil Wolf is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:13 AM
  #27  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

I'm an engineer. If a wing or any other device isn't functional during any part of a vehicle's use, it's pure rice. If it actually does function without screwing something up, then it's cool (especially if its function is not generally understood - suggesting that the designer/fabricator might be a step ahead of the rest).

Feng - I was mildly surprised to see this in the wiki reference. Right side, about halfway down.
A "riced" Honda Del Sol, with a body kit, fart can, and spoiler

Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 10:57 AM
  #28  
myredgt
3rd Gear Member
 
myredgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 535
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

It's funny how almost all of the ricer pictures on that link have the huge wing. Priceless.

- C
myredgt is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 11:07 AM
  #29  
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
157dB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 13,322
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

Functional is OK in the big wing department.
Non functional hood scoops lookOK as long as they are not too big.
Side scoops look like the retro stangs of years past as long as they
are also not too big. But hey, you gotta drive it, not me so mod away.
157dB is offline  
Old 02-29-2008, 12:19 PM
  #30  
Black Mamba GTT
4th Gear Member
 
Black Mamba GTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hawthorne, CA
Posts: 1,970
Default RE: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?

Umm I love my spoiler and really a small spoiler doesn't do much either so I guess spoilers are all rice then huh? Well get what you like and what you think looks good!!! I think my spoiler is one of my favorite parts of the car but that is what i like and think looks the best on my car!!! It's all a matter of opinion and lucky for you nobodys opinion even matters but your own!!
Black Mamba GTT is offline  


Quick Reply: From what I've seen here, big spoilers are considered "rice"?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.