wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
#31
RE: wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
Norm
#32
RE: wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
So my tune was worthless? I don't get why you posted this...
ORIGINAL: Norm Peterson
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
#33
RE: wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
ORIGINAL: Norm Peterson
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
#34
RE: wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
ORIGINAL: blueherd02gt
So my tune was worthless? I don't get why you posted this...
So my tune was worthless? I don't get why you posted this...
ORIGINAL: Norm Peterson
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
Unless you know something about the duty cycle of your existing injectors, blindly throwing larger ones at the car isn't necessarily the answer either. You'll lose resolution in the lower rpm ranges, and injectors aren't at their best at 1.0 millisecond pulse widths to begin with.
Norm
#35
RE: wide band A/F - must buy or eye candy
"Overboard" is a good description regarding the injectors. And it's not the tune, at least not directly.
What I was getting at is that 60# injectors are so large for 4.6 liters worth of engine that you may very well end up with idle that's not entirely stable and give up some low speed/light throttle behavior. I don't see any point in making that kind of sacrifice if you aren't requiring at least 75% duty cycle from the larger injectors (given that the OE's would be completely inadequate). Pulse widths from the PCM aren't going to change from incrementing in 0.10 ms steps to 0.05 ms steps just because you installed injectors that have twice the flow. And if your OE injectors were working at 1.5 ms at idle, figure that the 60's would need to be down around 0.75 ms, which is below the level at which the operation of these things ends up in consistent fueling.
Norm
What I was getting at is that 60# injectors are so large for 4.6 liters worth of engine that you may very well end up with idle that's not entirely stable and give up some low speed/light throttle behavior. I don't see any point in making that kind of sacrifice if you aren't requiring at least 75% duty cycle from the larger injectors (given that the OE's would be completely inadequate). Pulse widths from the PCM aren't going to change from incrementing in 0.10 ms steps to 0.05 ms steps just because you installed injectors that have twice the flow. And if your OE injectors were working at 1.5 ms at idle, figure that the 60's would need to be down around 0.75 ms, which is below the level at which the operation of these things ends up in consistent fueling.
Norm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-25-2015 06:30 PM