360 RWHP
08-05-2008, 09:31 PM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,170
RE: 360 RWHP
i agree...kinda. i was always an all motor guy, my 65 mustang was gunna be a stroker N/A head cam intake carb long tubes and exhaust...i got the heads cam intake carb long tubes...and then i got the 07 mustang...and supercharged it...now im slappin a turbo on the 65. once you get boosted and get used to forced induction, you never go back. its addicting and expensive...and oh so soooooooo good
always have respect for thats badass NA cars though.
always have respect for thats badass NA cars though.
08-05-2008, 09:34 PM
#12
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,182
RE: 360 RWHP
You can do that with a real motor but ford hasn't made one of those in at least 20 years.. 281 cu/in v-8's are like the motors the hot wheels boys put in their die cast molds. It isn't cost effective or easy at all to do. Don't get me wrong I am a ford guy through and through,but their motors do not like to be naturally aspirated. They simply aren't big enough and do not flow well enough and they cannot be stroked enough over to be worth a ****.
ORIGINAL: Flatline1980
i seen that 350 post and i posted up a while back about 351.. I was just wondering.. I don't believe in the bottle.. I was taught let the motor do the talking.. It's an idea i like to play around with.. When people ask what S/C one is running and you can pop off and say "All motor" they won't believe ya but when you show them, watch the faces light up.. Thats me though.. Thanks folks..
i seen that 350 post and i posted up a while back about 351.. I was just wondering.. I don't believe in the bottle.. I was taught let the motor do the talking.. It's an idea i like to play around with.. When people ask what S/C one is running and you can pop off and say "All motor" they won't believe ya but when you show them, watch the faces light up.. Thats me though.. Thanks folks..
