Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2010 Revealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2008, 11:37 PM
  #21  
Mustang_Joe
2nd Gear Member
 
Mustang_Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by 07BLACKGT
AH ha!
There is the answer for the Camaro.Now, I have a feeling we won't be getting anything new in 2011 as far as engines go. They should have the supercharger a FACTORY option instead of dealer option.
[/IMG]
They do, it's called the GT500 and it will anally rape the 420HP camaro in the 1/4 and mod for mod.
Mustang_Joe is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 12:54 AM
  #22  
lunarweasel
4th Gear Member
 
lunarweasel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,282
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang_Joe
They do, it's called the GT500 and it will anally rape the 420HP camaro in the 1/4 and mod for mod.


The GT500 costs 20k more. Don't know how much you are bringing in, but that is a big deal to most of us.

I like the argument about just modding the GT with the factory SC for less than the Camaro. The same argument could be made about modding the SS to blow away the GT500. Im sure 20k in mods to a stock SS would blow away a Shelby.

I still think the base GT should have been 350 hp with a 270 HP DI V6 for a base. Oh well, Ill just stick with my 65. (where I belong anyway)
lunarweasel is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:48 AM
  #23  
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,491
Default

Originally Posted by moonweasel
The GT500 costs 20k more.
Maybe when they first came out. They're easily had for MSRP or less now.
Diabolical! is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 05:11 AM
  #24  
fyrchkn
 
fyrchkn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: oh
Posts: 6
Default

So whats the price diff. between the new camaro and gt500 like $7,000. I know a place that will put a procharger on for that much. With just 5-6 psi would put the camaro around 615hp. Like 520-540 rwhp. That perfect for me I think that kind of hp is just right. I've had 2 LS1's in my car history and never had a problem with the motor so I think the LS3 would be the same.
fyrchkn is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:15 AM
  #25  
stangboy555
2nd Gear Member
 
stangboy555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 177
Default

I'm not very impressed. I think I'll keep my 07' :-)
stangboy555 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:00 AM
  #26  
94Thunderbirdpunk
2nd Gear Member
 
94Thunderbirdpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: INDY
Posts: 227
Default

Two big complaints:
1. Needs factory stock bullitts.
2. Needs some kind of a read deck wing like the S197


Now I know everyone here is complaining about the engine. For all we know a Boss 302 package will be offered that will give us the power we were hoping for so badly. I see nothing wrong with having a slightly polished 3v under the hood for the GT. Keep in mind the GT is supposed to be the base of V8 packages. Plus you guys are competing just fine with the vehicles that are on the road as it is right now. If you think the camaro's are going to be crazy fast I would think otherwise. They are pretty bloated. Looks like the new GT is a bit more streamlined, almost like it may have shed a few lbs. Let's keep our fingers crossed for that. Maybe Ford realized shedding pounds can make up for lack of hp in this new ponycar market.
94Thunderbirdpunk is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:01 AM
  #27  
ODDYSEY
Site Moderator of Fury!
 
ODDYSEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,104
Default

I like how the new model looks, however I still prefer the 05-09 model because it has a more retro feel. And without adding more power, I don't see the need to upgrade.
ODDYSEY is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:04 AM
  #28  
guitar00dude
1st Gear Member
 
guitar00dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 76
Default

i said this in another thread.. this reminds me of the 86-87 transition than anything else..... i believe in overall look it is not more than the 86-87 change but actually cosmetics of the '10 is way more than 86-87 was just what headlights and tail lights? and the GT body kit option and i said beofe this may drive 99-04 owenrs to buy.. but i dont think many if any 05-09 owners will noit go for another loan for this... other than a special edition car

Last edited by guitar00dude; 11-18-2008 at 10:10 AM.
guitar00dude is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:10 AM
  #29  
tungsten07
2nd Gear Member
 
tungsten07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 365
Default

+1 definitely feels like 1987 all over again. not really the big changes I was hoping for. infact some of the changes I don't care for at all... such as the rear end. ah well i'm keeping my 07 and waiting for the '11 or '12 year model when we can expect a totally new car and I'll see how that one goes. In a way I'm kinda glad because now I don't have to worry about trading in my car and taking a loss lol.
tungsten07 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:28 AM
  #30  
Orion_240
6th Gear Member
 
Orion_240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 5,390
Default

But isn't it a good thing that they didn't change the engine? Now you can upgrade Mustangs and just switch over all your power-adders! They should fit under that new hood, right?
And there is still a spoiler delete option so you might try adding a more traditional wing if that's a preference.
Orion_240 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2010 Revealed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.