2010 Revealed
11-18-2008, 04:07 PM
#61
BEWARE OF THIS SELLER. He will sell you junk and call you an idiot for falling for it. Know what you are buying! Admin
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lansing, IL
Posts: 1,061
Yeah thats true! But just imagine how many people from all different branches were working on this car, finding the best possible option for both the producer and the costumer, and now some come here saying "im dissappointed", "less HP than camaro", "rice looking front"...i mean come on! This is a beautiful Stang IMO! And when it comes to power don't we all love boosting our engines, not matter how big they are?
11-18-2008, 04:09 PM
#62
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
blog with photos
I blogged about this and linked to some photos on Flickr...
http://www.mustangperformanceblog.co...ally-revealed/
http://www.mustangperformanceblog.co...ally-revealed/
11-18-2008, 04:24 PM
#63
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Hmm. Lets think for a second about this.
2010 2010
Mustang GT Vs. Camaro SS
Horse Power: 315HP 422HP
Torque: 320ft-lb 408ft-lb
Price (Base): $30,095 $30,995
Gas: 15/23 16/26
Camaro Internals Max Capability: 700+ RWHP
Mustang Internals Max: Around 500-600 RWHP
I still dont see where the mustang is better? You be the Judge. IMO 2010 Mustang GT= FAIL
2010 2010
Mustang GT Vs. Camaro SS
Horse Power: 315HP 422HP
Torque: 320ft-lb 408ft-lb
Price (Base): $30,095 $30,995
Gas: 15/23 16/26
Camaro Internals Max Capability: 700+ RWHP
Mustang Internals Max: Around 500-600 RWHP
I still dont see where the mustang is better? You be the Judge. IMO 2010 Mustang GT= FAIL
11-18-2008, 04:27 PM
#65
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 253
Im sorry but this car looks like ****. I embrace the idea of a more aggressive looking Mustang but this is a step backwards from the S197's we already know. The rear looks like complete crap to top it off. Though I'll probably get used to the redesigned front end and its great they finally refined the over sized fender flares. 315hp....are you kidding me? 300hp out of the current GT was refreshing, but for a redesigned Mustang especially after starting the retro muscle car bs that everyone is copying 315hp is just insulting and embarrassing.
11-18-2008, 04:28 PM
#66
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,282
"=FAIL" is the lamest internet trend yet.
Anyway, as I said before, the 3.5 DI 6 in the Fusion (263 hp I believe) with the Mustang weighing 500 lbs less than the V6 Camaro would have been an AWESOME match up.
---
BIG deal is that they have improved handling. www.autoblog.com has a video of some guys from Ford talking about it. All cars have stiffer rates etc.
Anyway, as I said before, the 3.5 DI 6 in the Fusion (263 hp I believe) with the Mustang weighing 500 lbs less than the V6 Camaro would have been an AWESOME match up.
---
BIG deal is that they have improved handling. www.autoblog.com has a video of some guys from Ford talking about it. All cars have stiffer rates etc.
11-18-2008, 04:48 PM
#67
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
BIG deal is that they have improved handling. www.autoblog.com has a video of some guys from Ford talking about it. All cars have stiffer rates etc.
11-18-2008, 04:51 PM
#68
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
