2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Crankcase ventilation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
Rubrignitz's Avatar
Rubrignitz
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,897
From: TX
Default Crankcase ventilation

Has anyone removed the stock valve-cover to intake crankcase vent lines and replaced with a filter-type?

I've seen folks hook up the "oil-collector" system but are these even required? I would think you could just plug the hole on the intake and replace the valve cover tube with a ventilated/filter top. Pics please if you've done this.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
xxDerek's Avatar
xxDerek
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 966
From: San Jose, California
Default

Why would you?
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
wilkinda's Avatar
wilkinda
2010 Section Moderator
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,328
From: Lithia, FL
Default

Originally Posted by xxDerek
Why would you?
+1 on the Why would you?
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #4  
Rubrignitz's Avatar
Rubrignitz
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,897
From: TX
Default

I dunno, why would someone devise an "oil separator system"? I was just wondering why they wouldn't just plug the intake hole and replace with a crankcase filter-cap.

Now that I'm thinking about it, that may cause a vacuum condition and/or CEL issue.

Just figured I'd post something I'm wondering about and what the consequences would be...
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rubrignitz
I dunno, why would someone devise an "oil separator system"? I was just wondering why they wouldn't just plug the intake hole and replace with a crankcase filter-cap.

Now that I'm thinking about it, that may cause a vacuum condition and/or CEL issue.

Just figured I'd post something I'm wondering about and what the consequences would be...

The reason for doing this is pretty good for some. The recirculation does a few things.

1. Recirculates warm air into your intake when your motor is cold, thus helping it warm up faster. It helps emissions by getting your car to operating temperature faster where it is most efficent.

2. Recirculates the "bad" vapors that would/could otherwise be vented to the atmosphere, burning them over and over again in the motor until they are expelled.

The bad thing is those vapors contain contaminants which are not good for the motor. People with FI do this because of the increased pressure with running boost into a motor. This lets extra or more oil go through the breathers coating the intake, thottle body and building up deposits of nastiness. There are more technical ways to describe it but I'm not a mechanic.

I would not put a breather directly on the cam cover spout opening. The reason for this is a mixture of gas/carbon/oil and other emissions emit from this thing. Just a beather will cause there to be a gooey mess down the side of your cam cover and maybe on the underside of your hood. The cheapest way to do it is get 4-5' of the same diameter tubing and two small breathers to go on the end of each hose. Run them to just behind the headlight and ziptie them in place. For guys with normal power levels running NA this doesn't seem to be needed but it won't hurt. For guys with any form of FI, they should have something done.

I didn't like the mess the breathers did so I put a little catch can (coke can cut in half) under the passenger side filter. It catches probably a teaspoon of fluid for each tank of fuel and alot of it evaporates as it comes out.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #6  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default

It won't cause a vaccuum or CEL issue.
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #7  
Rubrignitz's Avatar
Rubrignitz
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,897
From: TX
Default

Hmmm, good to know! I knew that the crankcase gases (blowby etc) couldn't be good for combustion but were mainly for emissions purposes (as you stated about the recycling of the gases). I was uncertain as to whether a CEL/vacuum issue would emerge but you cleared that up. Great info! thanks.
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #8  
GrayPony's Avatar
GrayPony
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,227
From:
Default

easy to make...here's mine. A must with FI

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
apicia
Pipes, Boost & Juice
14
Jun 29, 2007 01:58 PM
BlueStang6
V6 S197 General Discussion
28
Jul 8, 2006 08:42 PM
flapjack
V6 S197 General Discussion
21
May 12, 2006 11:19 PM
Twisted
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
4
Apr 20, 2006 07:07 AM
fearthis8544
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
1
Jan 23, 2006 05:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.