MustangForums.com

MustangForums.com (https://mustangforums.com/forum/index.php)
-   2005-2014 Mustangs (https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005-2014-mustangs-43/)
-   -   2010 Mustang GT Dyno @ MAGNAFLOW (https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005-2014-mustangs/523163-2010-mustang-gt-dyno-magnaflow.html)

bolivianpimp 03-12-2009 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by ThisBlood147 (Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.

But isn't the 2010 mustang exactly like the 05-09 mustang just intake/tune? So, wouldn't this mean that we should see the same results if we put the catback into our models?

steele901 03-12-2009 10:54 AM


Originally Posted by 4literv6 (Post 6017978)
sounds great kinda confused why a 3" system on an NA 4.6l made more HP I could understand on a fi 4.6 or the 5.4 motor

especially considering its already got 3" exhaust

ThisBlood147 03-12-2009 03:41 PM


Originally Posted by bolivianpimp (Post 6019248)
But isn't the 2010 mustang exactly like the 05-09 mustang just intake/tune? So, wouldn't this mean that we should see the same results if we put the catback into our models?

I thought that the 2010's would about on par with an intake/tune 05-09 also. But no catback has ever pushed an intake/tuned S197 over 300rwhp.....not that I know of. We'd have to do full exhaust with LT's to accomplish this. Either the computer on the new cars is radically different than ours (in a very good way)....or, like I said, this was a very generous dyno.

mygt500 03-15-2009 01:41 PM

Very nice sound and I love my magnaflow magnapacks!!!!!!!!!!

chad05gt 03-18-2009 08:53 AM


Originally Posted by ThisBlood147 (Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.

Very generous...

Ill believe it when I see a 2010 w/ only axel backs run mid 12's...

ahddm 03-18-2009 11:53 AM

while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it

torque_is_good 03-18-2009 12:24 PM

It was probably a manual transmission on the dyno. Autos will see the usual lower results.

torque_is_good 03-18-2009 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by ahddm (Post 6036092)
while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it

stock gt 350 FWHP?

Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam?

ahddm 03-18-2009 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by torque_is_good (Post 6036161)
stock gt 350 FWHP?

Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam?

I'm looking for a copy of the video now I'll post if I can find.

Black Mamba GTT 03-18-2009 05:20 PM

No way you gain that much from a cat back without putting headers in the equation. maybe 5rwhp............maybe


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands