Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
(Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.
|
Originally Posted by 4literv6
(Post 6017978)
sounds great kinda confused why a 3" system on an NA 4.6l made more HP I could understand on a fi 4.6 or the 5.4 motor
|
Originally Posted by bolivianpimp
(Post 6019248)
But isn't the 2010 mustang exactly like the 05-09 mustang just intake/tune? So, wouldn't this mean that we should see the same results if we put the catback into our models?
|
Very nice sound and I love my magnaflow magnapacks!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
(Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.
Ill believe it when I see a 2010 w/ only axel backs run mid 12's... |
while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it
|
It was probably a manual transmission on the dyno. Autos will see the usual lower results.
|
Originally Posted by ahddm
(Post 6036092)
while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it
Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam? |
Originally Posted by torque_is_good
(Post 6036161)
stock gt 350 FWHP?
Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam? |
No way you gain that much from a cat back without putting headers in the equation. maybe 5rwhp............maybe
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands