Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I can now see why those that HATE 20"s do.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2009, 08:56 PM
  #11  
tungsten07
2nd Gear Member
 
tungsten07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 365
Default

yeah that was probably done on purpose. look up "tire stretching" the newest/dumbest thing people are doing now. it's all about fitting the smallest size tire you could possibly fit on a wheel and stretching it to make it fit. stupid looking and dangerous.
tungsten07 is offline  
Old 06-14-2009, 09:02 PM
  #12  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by tungsten07
yeah that was probably done on purpose. look up "tire stretching" the newest/dumbest thing people are doing now. it's all about fitting the smallest size tire you could possibly fit on a wheel and stretching it to make it fit. stupid looking and dangerous.
I've seen people do that on smaller cars with smaller rims. Never on a american ride.

I'm not being naive, but I refuse to believe this owner did this on purpose. I think they did it out of not knowing any better.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 06-14-2009, 09:07 PM
  #13  
GA05GT
2nd Gear Member
 
GA05GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by 4literv6
that look the stretched tire is euro style looks like crap but that is the scene where its hot I have 20X9" razors with 265/35/20's
I love it but I would go 275/35/20 when I have to change tires I had 20X8.5" w/245/35/20 didn't like that to much looked a little stretched imo but hey its your car if you love it since you have to pay for it thats all that should matter right?
edit those 22's actually don't look that bad

Off topic, nice whip!
GA05GT is offline  
Old 06-14-2009, 09:20 PM
  #14  
fender12
1st Gear Member
 
fender12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 74
Default

Thats all I see in Louisiana. Mostly on crown vics but it is really dangerous.
fender12 is offline  
Old 06-14-2009, 09:25 PM
  #15  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by fender12
Thats all I see in Louisiana. Mostly on crown vics but it is really dangerous.
I swear its got to be because narrower tires are cheaper, please tell me they ARE CHEAPER, lol.

Running 20"s is already putting your rims at more risk to pot hole damage, why make it even worse by eliminating the lip around the edge of the rim?

Last edited by Bmr4life; 06-14-2009 at 09:27 PM.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 12:51 AM
  #16  
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Legion5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Near Wash. DC Posts: 13,541
Posts: 2,497
Default

Originally Posted by eolson
I suspect these individuals might be pimps, and have no sense of taste, beyond their original choice of the car in the first place. Are there a lot of hoes entering and exiting the vehicles as well? That would really cement my concept. Erik
I think you just made my "hoe" give birth with that comment while laughing so hard.
Legion5 is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 06:51 AM
  #17  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

The small diameter doesn't bother me nearly as much as the fact that they are about 20% undersize in terms of load capacity at any given inflation pressure. That size is actually mfr-approved for fitment out to 8.5" or in some cases 9" wide rims.

No, there won't be much sidewall sticking out past the flanges even on wheels that are of legit width, and this in itself seems to be a difficult thing for many US domestic musclecar/ponycar enthusiasts to accept.

I'll have to wait until I get home to see the picture (blame corporate internet filtering). Meanwhile, I suspect that it's not quite as extreme as the picture in post #19 of this thread.

Wild "stretches" are absolutely done intentionally, for reasons of "style".


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 06-15-2009 at 07:13 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:52 AM
  #18  
CutterWolf
5th Gear Member
 
CutterWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 2,616
Default

265x35 is what I run on my Razor's too, great fit and look.
CutterWolf is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:55 AM
  #19  
wilkinda
2010 Section Moderator
 
wilkinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lithia, FL
Posts: 3,328
Default

wow..he is a rolling blow-out time bomb in that #19 thread pic
wilkinda is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 08:20 AM
  #20  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
The small diameter doesn't bother me nearly as much as the fact that they are about 20% undersize in terms of load capacity at any given inflation pressure. That size is actually mfr-approved for fitment out to 8.5" or in some cases 9" wide rims.

No, there won't be much sidewall sticking out past the flanges even on wheels that are of legit width, and this in itself seems to be a difficult thing for many US domestic musclecar/ponycar enthusiasts to accept.

I'll have to wait until I get home to see the picture (blame corporate internet filtering). Meanwhile, I suspect that it's not quite as extreme as the picture in post #19 of this thread.

Wild "stretches" are absolutely done intentionally, for reasons of "style".


Norm
Can't wait til you get home. Your picture is definitely stretched more, but sadly it looks better. I still don't approve although it looks better.
Bmr4life is offline  


Quick Reply: I can now see why those that HATE 20"s do.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.