2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Nitto NT-05 on stock 07 gt fanblades (18")

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #11  
chris09's Avatar
chris09
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 236
From: Around the world
Default

i wanted to do this with my factory 17” 5 spokers. factory size is 235 45 17 i believe. think i would be ok with some 255’s in the nitto nt05 flavor?
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #12  
Jizz's Avatar
Jizz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 355
Default

Look at Nitto's Website...

For "my rim" the 18" Chrome Bullits (sp?)

NT555 Tire
235/50-18 recommended rim is 6.5 (7.5) 8.5
255/45-18 recommended rim is 8.0 (8.5) 9.5
275/40-18 recommended rim is 9.0 (9.5) 11.0

Then you can use this to see the difference in rotation and width etc...
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

Now for your tires the;
235/45-17 it looks like you can go

The NT05
255/40-17 BUT THE recommended rim is 8.5 (9.0) 10.0
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #13  
JA66's Avatar
JA66
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 35
From: Missouri
Default

255/45-18 are the way to go I think. Ive got coopers on my stang in that size, and they seem to fit really well, they stick out slightly further than the wheel, unlike the stock size.
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #14  
157dB's Avatar
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,322
From: NW Arkansas
Default

255/50-18

255 divided by 25.4
10.03937008 x .50 TREAD WIDTH
5.019685039 x 2 SIDEWALL HEIGHT
10.03937008 + 18 RIM DIAMETER
28.03937008 x 3.141592654 TIRE HEIGHT
88.08827905 ROUND
63360 divided by 88.08827905
713 REVS / MILE

Its just an example of the math. Dont let this confuse you.....

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tirecalc.php
https://www.rsracing.com/tech-wheel.html
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCal...?action=submit
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html

Last edited by 157dB; Oct 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM.
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 11:21 PM
  #15  
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,211
From: Hawaii
Default

lost me 157db

we were talking about a 255/45 which is within 1/2" of the 235/50
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 07:03 AM
  #16  
Jizz's Avatar
Jizz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 355
Default

235/50-18 vs 255/45-18 vs 255/50-18

235/50-18
Sidewall: 4.6
Radius: 13.6
Diameter: 27.3
Circumference: 85.6
Revs/Mile: 740

255/45-18
Sidewall: 4.5
Radius: 13.5
Diameter: 27
Circumference: 84.9
Revs/Mile: 746

255/50-18
Sidewall: 5.0
Radius: 14.0
Diameter: 28.0
Circumference: 88.1
Revs/Mile: 719
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 09:37 AM
  #17  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by Tylus
I suggest 255/45 and 275/45.

they are both only 0.5" shorter than the oem 235/50/18 size...so that is about 1/4" less sidewall than with the original rubber
275/45 is 27.7" tall, half an inch or so taller than the OE sizes. This 45-series tire IS mfr-approved for mounting on 8.5" wide wheels. 275/40 generally is not (there is a tiny possibility that some mfr makes some tire model that they claim is OK on 8.5" but I'm not going to try to chase it down).


alot of people run the 275 width on their oem rims. And it is almost never an issue. It will become an issue if you are an autocrosser, or like to take corners really hard. that will cause alot of sidewall flex, and might possibly unseat the bead...causing a blowout.
Being half an inch under the minimum mfr-approved wheel width will give away some of the tires' lateral stiffness, so it'll feel a bit "lazy" about cornering. (ps - the word "almost" bothers me, a lot, because sometimes poo does happen. If/when it does, it'll be too late to wish you'd done differently)

I'm less concerned with unseating the bead than I am with extra heat generation in the sidewall, and where specifically in the sidewall that the extra heat gets concentrated. Something called a "flex point" moves up/down over the sidewall as wheel width is varied. Not all portions of the sidewall are equally capable of handling this local flexing or the temperature that is developed.

That said, being half an inch "below spec" is something that you can get away with for short duration or low-speed driving where the tire temperatures remain low. But loading a car so equipped up to the gills with all sorts of gear and taking three of your friends on a long highway trip in the middle of a Texas summer heat wave is probably asking for trouble.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; Oct 14, 2009 at 09:42 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PB Pod
Forum Issues and Feedback
1
Sep 17, 2015 08:32 PM
tj@steeda
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
0
Sep 17, 2015 07:32 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 16, 2015 07:53 PM
2007CalSpec
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
Sep 9, 2015 05:37 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 8, 2015 11:50 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.