Average speed
12-13-2009, 08:04 PM
#22
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 91
I like the idea, but it is a stupid implementation. Instead of a retarded bar graph they should do what all the other car companies out there do and give you a real time number. BMWs, Lexuses, Toyotas and more all give you the real time MPG number instead. Way more useful.
12-13-2009, 08:11 PM
#23
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 533
I like the idea, but it is a stupid implementation. Instead of a retarded bar graph they should do what all the other car companies out there do and give you a real time number. BMWs, Lexuses, Toyotas and more all give you the real time MPG number instead. Way more useful.
12-13-2009, 09:05 PM
#24
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 64
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it gives the "real-time" MPG number - the calculation seems to average the vehicle over a longer period of time...one that is not instantaneous. The bar graph is instantaneous visually, but does not give an actual number.
Last edited by Crazy Stallion; 12-13-2009 at 09:13 PM.
12-13-2009, 09:45 PM
#25
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 91
Yeah, there is only an average, not a real time/moment to moment/continuously calculated number to give you instantaneous mileage. I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure Ford has this same bar graph deal on all their cars. The Flex at least has the same thing. I would be happy if I was wrong though.
12-14-2009, 11:59 AM
#27
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,747
pay more attention to what rpms you are running than the MPG graph. You dont want to lug the engine with to low of RPMS and yet you dont want to run at 3 grand all the time....2100-2400 is pretty much ideal for me with 4.10s....the engine purrs and is instantly ready to run if you want to get up and go. The graph pretty much drops to 1 or 0 with any touch of the pedal on mine which makes it worthless IMO
How low is to low on the rpm's? I have heard 1000 or less would be "lugging" the motor and a bad place to be, but if you shift at Ford's recommended shift speeds, then you stay between 900-2000 rpm's?
12-14-2009, 01:02 PM
#28
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 337
Lugging is a factor that can be measured using your "assometer".
You can feel the lugging by the seat of your pants, for my car ('10 GT, 5-speed, 3.73), my 'feel' is keep it between 1800-2500 when crusing.
A quick flick down one notch and a punch leaves most mere mortals in my rearview mirror.
You can feel the lugging by the seat of your pants, for my car ('10 GT, 5-speed, 3.73), my 'feel' is keep it between 1800-2500 when crusing.
A quick flick down one notch and a punch leaves most mere mortals in my rearview mirror.
12-14-2009, 02:19 PM
#29
6th Gear Member
The MPG reading is an average and not a spontaneous value. On top of that, most of the values are not very accurate. Based on forum feedback, I'd guess that maybe 1 out of 10 on-boards are consistently within .2-.3 MPG of hand calculated values using the gas pump # of gallons vs. the on-board "gallons used" value. You COULD push the reset while cruising but then you end up with a bogus and meaningless value. Reset it at the pump when you fill-up and leave it alone until the subsequent fill-up.
12-14-2009, 02:29 PM
#30
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Livin in NC, from Michigan...Yooper
Posts: 2,008
Yep Nuke is right, I have a new Garmin and it has a Eco setting and you put in the price of the fuel, the average that you got from not hitting the reset when you fill up and does a pretty good job of telling you at next fill up where you are at, .... it keeps track of the route you take daily, the old Carbon foot print, LOL puttin down a big one of those, how much time spent driving, what it cost for the week give the actual read average I think, hey if i get 23 avg a week, for a power car, good for me, better than my 07 CTS with v6 aauto.