2000 vs 2011 interior
03-20-2010, 07:21 PM
#12
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 750
Absolutely! I thought it looked really good in the web pics and magazines because the lighting was just perfect. My wife insisted I take a look before I bought my Mustang. When I saw it in person my jaw hit the floor. So freaking ugly! I knew I wanted my Mustang straight away.
03-20-2010, 08:50 PM
#13
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 36
RT - I agree on the other models. I really hate that Camaro steering wheel. I'm just stuck on the doors flowing into the dash. I too think that the Z is too busy... almost like they bolt things on as they think of it. One item the Mustangs have to work really well for me is the head room. I'm tall and my head actually hits the roof in the Z. I do think Ford has done an excellent job mixing just the right amount of retro into the the modern style.
03-20-2010, 10:43 PM
#14
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: va beach va
Posts: 293
I like the mustang since it has the best combo of both the interior and exterior. I love the exterior of all three (camaro challenger mustang) But the challenger has a horrid interior both in looks and fit and finish (its straight out of a pt cruiser) Camaros interior has awesome fit and finish, but so bland and ugly. Mustang has an awesome looking interior and very good fit and finish, and that classic aggressive stance on the outside. Plus the new 400+ engine coming. Its just the perfect modern american muscle car.
03-20-2010, 11:44 PM
#15
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 748
Wow! This is pretty amazing, 13 posts and no comment from jdmcbride or any other of the haters commenting on the rear end of the 2010, even though we aren't even talking about it! (I guess its only a matter of time though 
)
Anyway, as a former 2004 owner, I really liked its interior, but the 2010 has got it beat IMO. Of the 6 Mustangs I've owned, its the most comfortable and the best looking. (IMO of course)
)Anyway, as a former 2004 owner, I really liked its interior, but the 2010 has got it beat IMO. Of the 6 Mustangs I've owned, its the most comfortable and the best looking. (IMO of course)
03-20-2010, 11:48 PM
#16
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 750
03-21-2010, 12:10 AM
#18
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 2,176
Hey I dont really like the 2010+ rear end as well either and I could do wtihout all the freakin' plastic cladding on the bottom of the car. That said for 412 bhp I can forgive a few sins.
Give me the 2010 GT500 nose, rockers, and tail (but modified with tailights without the cutouts) and it would have been perfect. But its not enough to stop me from buying the car.
Things change and Ford cant keep building the same black Mode T's forever.
I really like looking at the back of Ravens car because being black it makes the plastic cladding disappear to a certain extent and I think spoiler delete really helps make the new tail lights look better.
Give me the 2010 GT500 nose, rockers, and tail (but modified with tailights without the cutouts) and it would have been perfect. But its not enough to stop me from buying the car.
Things change and Ford cant keep building the same black Mode T's forever.
I really like looking at the back of Ravens car because being black it makes the plastic cladding disappear to a certain extent and I think spoiler delete really helps make the new tail lights look better.
Last edited by Gene K; 03-21-2010 at 12:13 AM.