2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Took the 2011 to the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #21  
akiba17's Avatar
akiba17
Not 100% a dick
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 953
From: Texas
Default

Makes you wonder what else is weak on these 2011's
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #22  
AmericanSpeed's Avatar
AmericanSpeed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,031
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Very nice ET
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 02:22 PM
  #23  
Adam's Avatar
Adam
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,162
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Blew the clutch on the 4th run - WTF??? You aren't the first company to blow the clutch relatively quick either. Seems like the clutch is way too weak.
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
Riptide's Avatar
Riptide
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,193
From: Montaner
Default

lulz

Should've got the automatic.
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #25  
akiba17's Avatar
akiba17
Not 100% a dick
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 953
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Riptide
lulz

Should've got the automatic.
No.
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #26  
Driver72's Avatar
Driver72
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 632
From:
Default

Originally Posted by akiba17
No.
Double no.
They probably enjoy driving too much to get an old fashioned auto with no bells or whistles with it (ie: paddle shifter, column shifter, sport mode button, rev matching downshifts, etc.)
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 03:50 PM
  #27  
Driver72's Avatar
Driver72
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 632
From:
Default

Cant believe nobody has asked yet:

Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?

To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.

Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #28  
john z's Avatar
john z
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 182
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Driver72
Cant believe nobody has asked yet:

Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?

To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.

Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?

Glad you asked.

This is the premium model minus the brake upgrade, HID's and navigation.
4.56 Gears
87 Octane (b/c that's what it had in it still from the dealer)
Only weight reduction was replacing the suspension items with aftermarket and they are lighter.
Track : Palm Beach International Raceway 90*+ for the outside temp w/ 85% humidity.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cr620
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
2
Oct 3, 2022 10:18 PM
BeatnikFink
New Member Area
6
Oct 1, 2015 08:00 PM
CS2007
Florida Regional Chapter
0
Sep 29, 2015 12:06 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
Sep 28, 2015 10:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.