Took the 2011 to the track
06-14-2010, 03:45 PM
#26
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 632
06-14-2010, 03:50 PM
#27
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 632
Cant believe nobody has asked yet:
Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?
To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.
Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?
Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?
To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.
Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?
06-24-2010, 01:46 PM
#28
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 182
Cant believe nobody has asked yet:
Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?
To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.
Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?
Options on the car? (ie base, premium, etc etc.)
Axle ratio?
Octane gas used?
Any weight reduction?
Which track and what was the DA during that run?
To get a 114 mph trap on just a 12.3 ET means your car is running exceptionally well (probably fastest stock motor, no power increasing mods, 11 GT to date).
It's almost hard to believe getting a 114 mph trap on 12.3 ET with the 60' time you got and there being no power mods. Kind of thinking you must have weight reduction mods or that's just a really fast track (great DA's, runs a bit downhill, and bit of tailwind) like ATCO or Cecil.
Good job none the less and bummer on the clutch. What rpms were you launching at?
Glad you asked.
This is the premium model minus the brake upgrade, HID's and navigation.
4.56 Gears
87 Octane (b/c that's what it had in it still from the dealer)
Only weight reduction was replacing the suspension items with aftermarket and they are lighter.
Track : Palm Beach International Raceway 90*+ for the outside temp w/ 85% humidity.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BeatnikFink
New Member Area
6
10-01-2015 08:00 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
mungodrums
Suspension
0
09-24-2015 10:12 PM
