Looking to squeeze 400hp(or more) naturally aspirated (HELP)
#13
Include all the tricks
stroked, cam, heads, intake, etc....
Compile a build list and price for a forced induction setup that will dyno 400 RWHP
That's an everyday common output with simple F.I. kits that are easy to come by, so no headache for this shopping list.
Now, after both builds...let's compare under the curve torque. Let's compare torque of both builds at the 3500 rpm range and less.
I guarantee, I'm going to beat you hands down. Even if you could buy cheap used parts for the N/A build to achieve those goals. The last person I read about who broke the 400 RWHP with a N/A 4.6L engine spent over 6,000 IIRC. You can spend less than that in a non intercooled F.I setup and have a much broader torque curve.
N/A builds on the 4.6 3V modular is NOT cost effective versus F.I.
N - Natural or Naturally
A- Aspiration or Aspirated
Does the extreme cooling of air that results from a shot of nitrous occur naturally in our atmosphere? No, it certainly does not. Therefore, your theory that it's "natural" couldn't be further from the truth. If you require nitrous (power adder) to achieve 400 RWHP, you do NOT have a N/A engine that is capable of 400 RWHP.
Last edited by Unleashedbeast; 10-14-2010 at 02:10 AM.
#14
6th Gear Member
+1 on 330 RWHP; perhaps 340; with your list. By the time you're done with additional mods to get you to 400RWHP NA you'll have spent more than had you gone FI and probably have a less reliable ride.
#15
#16
Agreed FI is the most cost effective. I think N/A builds are cool, and I actually priced one out myself. It was going to cost 5-6k to have only about 350rwhp though. You can buy a Vortech standard kit from Brenspeed for $3899, which is what I did on the last car. Easy install and 415 to the wheels. I would only do an N/A build if that is your thing and you're interested in it for that reason. If power is the only goal, the supercharger makes a hell of a lot more sense.
#17
No, 400 N/A RWHP is NOT easy, and it requires to much money for the results. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it. Nitrous is NOT considered N/A, as it's considered a power adder. Let's examine the abbreviation N/A.
N - Natural or Naturally
A- Aspiration or Aspirated
Does the extreme cooling of air that results from a shot of nitrous occur naturally in our atmosphere? No, it certainly does not. Therefore, your theory that it's "natural" couldn't be further from the truth. If you require nitrous (power adder) to achieve 400 RWHP, you do NOT have a N/A engine that is capable of 400 RWHP.
That said, I do understand what he is trying to do in making it 400hp "all motor". I think it'd be a sick build and would be a fun car to drive. Definately go heads, cams, stroker kit, etc though if you do go all motor.
#18
No way you're gonna get 400+ with bolt ons.
Your list:
CAI+Tune
***** Thumpa Cams
JBA LT Headers + Catted H Pipe
Steeda U/D pulley
3.73 gear
Steeda motion delete plates
Probably 330 RWHP.
With heads and even a stroker block, maybe 380-390 RWHP.
With less money you could get to 435 RWHP easy using any SC or turbo. My $0.02.
Ric
Your list:
CAI+Tune
***** Thumpa Cams
JBA LT Headers + Catted H Pipe
Steeda U/D pulley
3.73 gear
Steeda motion delete plates
Probably 330 RWHP.
With heads and even a stroker block, maybe 380-390 RWHP.
With less money you could get to 435 RWHP easy using any SC or turbo. My $0.02.
Ric
Last edited by sailing220; 10-16-2010 at 06:59 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post