Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Looking to squeeze 400hp(or more) naturally aspirated (HELP)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2010, 12:06 AM
  #11  
stealth_GT
6th Gear Member
 
stealth_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Pole
Posts: 6,716
Default

400whp@7800 rpm sounds expensive and not very fun at all.

)-:

But I bet it sounds killer up top.. it better be, after how much it stalls at the light rofl
stealth_GT is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 01:52 AM
  #12  
foolio2k4
3rd Gear Member
 
foolio2k4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 667
Default

all that plus Ported heads then Ford racing manifold.

but if you want power past 360+ you need engine work.

also, you can do electric water pump. which will free up power as well.
foolio2k4 is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 02:02 AM
  #13  
Unleashedbeast
4th Gear Member
 
Unleashedbeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke
F.I. is NOT always the way to go. You can get to the same power level for about the same cost. and just as efficiantly.
And yes you can gt the same low RPM torque. Especially if your SC was
a centri.

I would advice YOU do some research and not just on forums.
Compile a build list and price for a N/A 4.6L 3V engine that will dyno 400 RWHP

Include all the tricks

stroked, cam, heads, intake, etc....

Compile a build list and price for a forced induction setup that will dyno 400 RWHP

That's an everyday common output with simple F.I. kits that are easy to come by, so no headache for this shopping list.

Now, after both builds...let's compare under the curve torque. Let's compare torque of both builds at the 3500 rpm range and less.

I guarantee, I'm going to beat you hands down. Even if you could buy cheap used parts for the N/A build to achieve those goals. The last person I read about who broke the 400 RWHP with a N/A 4.6L engine spent over 6,000 IIRC. You can spend less than that in a non intercooled F.I setup and have a much broader torque curve.

N/A builds on the 4.6 3V modular is NOT cost effective versus F.I.

Originally Posted by 07 Showstopper
400hp n/a is easy. 100 shot nitrous. Im sure alot of people tend to think that nitrous is f/i its definately n/a.
No, 400 N/A RWHP is NOT easy, and it requires to much money for the results. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it. Nitrous is NOT considered N/A, as it's considered a power adder. Let's examine the abbreviation N/A.

N - Natural or Naturally
A- Aspiration or Aspirated

Does the extreme cooling of air that results from a shot of nitrous occur naturally in our atmosphere? No, it certainly does not. Therefore, your theory that it's "natural" couldn't be further from the truth. If you require nitrous (power adder) to achieve 400 RWHP, you do NOT have a N/A engine that is capable of 400 RWHP.

Last edited by Unleashedbeast; 10-14-2010 at 02:10 AM.
Unleashedbeast is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 06:55 AM
  #14  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

+1 on 330 RWHP; perhaps 340; with your list. By the time you're done with additional mods to get you to 400RWHP NA you'll have spent more than had you gone FI and probably have a less reliable ride.
Nuke is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 09:33 AM
  #15  
chain1
4th Gear Member
 
chain1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,454
Default

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke
F.I. is NOT always the way to go. You can get to the same power level for about the same cost. and just as efficiantly.
And yes you can gt the same low RPM torque. Especially if your SC was
a centri.
Would love to hear how.
chain1 is offline  
Old 10-14-2010, 11:01 AM
  #16  
Mudflap
5th Gear Member
 
Mudflap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,062
Default

Agreed FI is the most cost effective. I think N/A builds are cool, and I actually priced one out myself. It was going to cost 5-6k to have only about 350rwhp though. You can buy a Vortech standard kit from Brenspeed for $3899, which is what I did on the last car. Easy install and 415 to the wheels. I would only do an N/A build if that is your thing and you're interested in it for that reason. If power is the only goal, the supercharger makes a hell of a lot more sense.
Mudflap is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 05:31 PM
  #17  
07 Showstopper
2nd Gear Member
 
07 Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by Unleashedbeast


No, 400 N/A RWHP is NOT easy, and it requires to much money for the results. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it. Nitrous is NOT considered N/A, as it's considered a power adder. Let's examine the abbreviation N/A.

N - Natural or Naturally
A- Aspiration or Aspirated

Does the extreme cooling of air that results from a shot of nitrous occur naturally in our atmosphere? No, it certainly does not. Therefore, your theory that it's "natural" couldn't be further from the truth. If you require nitrous (power adder) to achieve 400 RWHP, you do NOT have a N/A engine that is capable of 400 RWHP.
Naturally aspirated refers to atmospheric pressure.That means to be n/a the car could not have anything that puts a vaccuum on the intake. Does nitrous put a vaccuum on the intake? No, it adds extra oxygen and therefore allows for extra molecules of air and fuel to combust, thus adding power.

That said, I do understand what he is trying to do in making it 400hp "all motor". I think it'd be a sick build and would be a fun car to drive. Definately go heads, cams, stroker kit, etc though if you do go all motor.
07 Showstopper is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 06:57 PM
  #18  
sailing220
4th Gear Member
 
sailing220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,292
Default

No way you're gonna get 400+ with bolt ons.

Your list:

CAI+Tune
***** Thumpa Cams
JBA LT Headers + Catted H Pipe
Steeda U/D pulley
3.73 gear
Steeda motion delete plates

Probably 330 RWHP.

With heads and even a stroker block, maybe 380-390 RWHP.

With less money you could get to 435 RWHP easy using any SC or turbo. My $0.02.

Ric

Last edited by sailing220; 10-16-2010 at 06:59 PM.
sailing220 is offline  
Old 10-16-2010, 08:21 PM
  #19  
Elanor05
1st Gear Member
 
Elanor05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 108
Default

What if he adds an Aluminum DS and Intake manifold to his list could he see 350rwhp?
Elanor05 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nurdyguy
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
8
02-18-2024 07:58 PM
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
TheDutchTexan
Mustang Videos
0
09-10-2015 06:51 PM
jesse1125
AmericanMuscle.com
4
08-26-2015 02:34 PM
mustangfan305
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
08-07-2015 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: Looking to squeeze 400hp(or more) naturally aspirated (HELP)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.