2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Brakes question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #1  
richmod's Avatar
richmod
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,138
From: NC
Default Brakes question

I had my rear brakes done at the dealer about 2 weeks ago. At the time, they said my front pads were still good (about 50%), but that the rotors were glazed and should be machined, so I went ahead and did that.

Now I'm thinking I'll just go ahead and do the front pads myself now. (Believe it or not, they are the original front pads after 65K miles.).

My question - can I just replace the pads or do I need to machine the rotors again? I've put about 500 miles on the car since the front rotors were machined. How many miles max can I get away with before needing to machine them again (in case I don't get around to replacing the pads right away)?

TIA
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #2  
madmann26's Avatar
madmann26
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 189
From: Georgia
Default

Machine them,

Oreilly's will machine rotors or you may find a mom and pop shop that will machine them for you pretty cheap.
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #3  
richmod's Avatar
richmod
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,138
From: NC
Default

Bump for the morning crowd.
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
incorrigible's Avatar
incorrigible
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 369
From: NY
Default

You'll be fine. Don't waste your money.
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 11:57 AM
  #5  
BlackBetty's Avatar
BlackBetty
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 456
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Default

When I did my rear brakes for the first time, I wasn't able to get the rotors machined. I put the new pads on over the old, grooved rotors (not ideal, I know). Never had any issues.
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
HenryinFlorida's Avatar
HenryinFlorida
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 113
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by incorrigible
You'll be fine. Don't waste your money.
It's not just the matter of not wasting your money, you can only turn them down so much before they must be replaced.
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
usc49erfan's Avatar
usc49erfan
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 479
From: Florida
Default

you should be fine, if you managed to keep 50% of the pad life minimal if any damage should have occured to the rotor. You would be better off replacing the pads then doing the rotors. the only thing I find odd is that the back brakes had an issue before the fronts
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 11:14 AM
  #8  
157dB's Avatar
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,322
From: NW Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by richmod
I had my rear brakes done at the dealer about 2 weeks ago. At the time, they said my front pads were still good (about 50%), but that the rotors were glazed and should be machined, so I went ahead and did that.
Now I'm thinking I'll just go ahead and do the front pads myself now. (Believe it or not, they are the original front pads after 65K miles.).
My question - can I just replace the pads or do I need to machine the rotors again? I've put about 500 miles on the car since the front rotors were machined. How many miles max can I get away with before needing to machine them again (in case I don't get around to replacing the pads right away)?

TIA
Glazed Rotors dont require machining. Just a good scuffing
from some 100 grit sandpaper. They tore you a new one there.
The 'glazing' is actually brake pad material that has transfered
to the rotors. This is a good thing. Rotor machining is not
determined in miles but in the actuall condition of the rotors.
In a perfect world, rotors almost never need to be turned.
A simple deglazing will bring them to life again awaiting the
new brake pads. A cross hatch pattern is what you are looking
for. This allows the new pads to 'bed in' properly.
Google 'bedding brake pads'.
If they rotors are not smooth and properly glazed but scored and
have deep circular grooves in them, then its time ti machine them.
The deep grooves would be from not replacing the pads in time
and actually have the metal bacvker plate on the pads ride on
the rotors instead of blake lining material.
Inspect, determine, turn or scuff and install new rotors.
The rotors themselves have a minimum thickness cast into them
in the form of a number in thousands of an inch.
The very edge of some OEM rotors has a divit cut out of the edge.
Turn them past this divit and they could explode under heavy braking.

btw, Did they turn these rotors on the car or off the car.
In your presence or behind your back?
Rotor turning is the biggest scam in the book.

Originally Posted by usc49erfan
you should be fine, if you managed to keep 50% of the pad
life minimal if any damage should have occured to the rotor. You would be better off
replacing the pads then doing the rotors. the only thing I find odd is that the back
brakes had an issue before the fronts
Its not that odd.
My rears are taking a beating and the fronts look like new
after 40K miles. But then I dont use my brakes unless I really need to.
New rotors are soooo cheap, why would you not want brand new rotors
instead of turned rotors and pulsating brakes.

Last edited by 157dB; Aug 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tivo304
New Member Area
7
Aug 28, 2023 12:19 PM
DoctorScary
General Tech
6
Sep 9, 2015 07:53 AM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 8, 2015 11:50 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.